patching...
Update: Get Tewksbury's latest headlines in your inbox each morning—sign up for our daily newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

2013 Tax Rates by Municipality: How Does Tewksbury Compare?

Tewksbury's residential tax rate is above the average rate for the coming year in other towns and cities surveyed.

 

As 2013 begins, property tax rates are increasing for residents across Massachusetts, including in Tewksbury — so how does that compare to surrounding communities?

Out of 27 communities in the area, Tewksbury's 2013 residential tax rate lands among the higher rates, according to rates compiled by Patch through the state Department of Revenue's Division of Local Services.

Chelmsford's 2013 residential tax rate of $17.95 is the highest of the communities surveyed. Cambridge continues to levy the lowest residential taxes, with a 2013 rate of $8.66 (Cambridge also adopts a residential exemption).

The average residential tax rate for those communities surveyed was $13.09 in 2012 and has risen to $13.58 for this coming year.

Boston's commercial tax rate of $31.96 is the highest commercial rate of the communities surveyed, while Winchester is the lowest with a rate of $12.01.

Check the chart below to see comparisons between communities.

2013 Tax Rates By Municipality

Information taken from the state Division of Local Services. In order from lowest residential rate in 2013 to highest. See the attached PDF for more 2013 tax rates as approved by the state.

Community Residential Tax Rate   
   Commercial and Industrial Tax Rate   
   Residential Exemption
2013 2012 2013 2012
Cambridge 8.66 8.48  21.50 20.76 30%
Woburn 10.40 10.40 27.01 26.83
Saugus 11.28 11.04 24.90 24.16
Brookline 11.65 11.40 18.97 18.58 20%
Burlington 11.85 11.55 31.70 30.95
Peabody 11.98 11.82 23.57 23.43
Wakefield 12.29 11.90 24.97 24.18
Medford 12.36 12.03 24.39 23.72
Winchester 12.77 12.55 12.01 11.77
Melrose 13.03 12.76 19.90 19.47
Stoneham 13.06 12.61 21.00 20.25
Boston 13.14 13.04 31.96 31.92 30%
Belmont 13.33 13.35 13.33 13.35
Somerville 13.42 13.09 22.38 21.85 30%
Arlington 13.61 13.66 13.61 13.66
Wilmington 13.61 12.14 28.64 28.10
North Andover 13.72 12.92 18.85 19.16
Andover 14.51 14.15 24.26
23.54
Danvers 14.54 13.93 20.23 19.38
Lynnfield 14.82 14.26 16.29 15.56
Reading 14.94 14.15 14.94 14.15
Tewksbury 15.44 14.93 25.60 25.05
Malden 15.88 14.33 25.42 24.84 20%
North Reading 16.04 14.38 16.04 14.38
Westford 16.13 15.55 16.38 15.79
Salem 16.38 15.63 31.46 29.81 20%
Chelmsford 17.95 17.49 17.95 17.49
Related Topics: Commercial property tax, Property Taxes, Residential Taxes, and tax rates

Timothy M.

6:28 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Can somebody please explain the increase and where the money goes. It seems like a big jump. Happy New Year :- /

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Ferrari

1:04 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Pensions. They are the only thing that are constant, while taxes go up and services go down. Yet the numbers, 401K don't seem to have registered with the public sector jobs yet.

Bob DeVito

8:07 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

We were among the lowest in the area not so long ago. People will really feel this once our assessed values start rising.

Reply

mike t

8:38 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

It's funny how our tax rates are so high yet our town is a dump compared to the other towns in our same tax rate range (i.e. Reading,Lynnfield). We don't have any sidewalks. Our so called down town is a glorified highway rest stop, Crime rates are high and our houses and schools are run down. Well at least we have the Motel Caswell!

Reply

Dave G.

8:39 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Raising taxes again? The sewer rate went up 20% last year alone. We are still in a recession the last time I looked. Why raise taxes? Maybe we could change our name to Taxsbury.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

9:00 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Have to feed the beast!

The Beatles said it best...

Let me tell you how it will be,
There’s one for you, nineteen for me,
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
Should five per cent appear too small,
Be thankful I don’t take it all.
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,

Betsy Grecoe

9:03 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Maybe it's time residents take a firm pledge to do no overrides or debt exclusions and look toward what could be reduced in town spending to reduce the tax rate. I knew our tax rates were higher than Wilmington, but I didn't dream that they were higher than Andover, North Andover, Reading, Lynnfield, Burlington. As a town, we've done a lot and built a lot. Now is a good time to slow down and let our pocketbooks catch up with the costs.

Reply

Who Me?

9:28 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

The Town of Tewksbury is $250 to $265 Million in the red.

Which way do you think the tax rate will go?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

9:54 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Ben Franklin said it best...

"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."

Timothy M.

10:15 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Agree with Mike T. Our main St. (38), is awful. Barely any sidewalks, awful roads, etc. Don't mind paying taxes as long as they are going towards improving the town. Downtown would be a nice place to start. Some updating maybe. Add a sidewalk or maybe plow a sidewalk. Every other surrounding town does more to improve infrastructure. Just take a look next time you drive out of town...

Reply

Becca Bell

10:16 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Last year I had a heart attack when I noticed the 20% increase in my property tax. Now another increase?? And what do we have to show for it? East Street might as well be a dirt road it's in such bad condition...I'm embarrassed by it when friend and family have to drive on it to visit me. And like Mike T said, we have no sidewalks or nice town center. It's not a nice looking town. Maybe all the money went to the beautiful police station, senior center and high school? That's nice and all but what about the young couples with no kids that have to struggle to foot the bill for all of this and get NOTHING out of it?? I live in a condo and pay more in prop tax than most people I know pay on their houses in other towns. My husband and I are house hunting and have firmly crossed Tewksbury off the list. The town officials will be sorry when people like myself start leaving and other's don't want to move here because of the outlandish tax rate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

11:45 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Becca, there was a proposal by Market Basket to pave, curb and sidewalk East St. from Shawsheen St. To Maple Rd. in exchange they asked to expand their warehouse on East St., which would have resulted in an 11-15% increase in truck traffic on East St. Mind you that 80-90 Market Basket trucks already use the road daily. Planning Board member Nancy Reed led a pack, I believe 7 residents, who opposed the plan. They were able to stop the expansion. Market Basket struck back by moving a portion of their operations to Andover and now register their 150+ vehicles in Andover. This results in $200k in lost excise tax, $100k in lost commercial tax yearly, and a bumpy, horrible pothole filled road leading into our community. The kicker in my pants, is don't we want our planning board to be pro-business and pro-commercial tax growth? People yell, complain, gripe, and moan....only to re-elect her to another term. Tewksbury gets what it deserves.

Comment_arrow

TomH

7:12 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Cecil, I agree with your analysis. I just want to add an addendum. Balladvale St in Andover is getting as pothole filled as East St here in Tewksbury. Its so bad, I wonder just how much those MB tractor trailers weigh.

Comment_arrow

Bob Ferrari

12:49 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Cecil, you don't know what you are talking about. The big question on that "expansion" is "who approved building a huge warehouse in the middle of residential neighborhood in the first place." We cannot continue averting our eyes to ridiculous planning from the past and you suggest by ignorance to continue that trend. When the warehouse was built there it included a 200 foot no build buffer between the warehouse and the residents. A few years ago, that buffer "disappeared". How did that happen?

Do you even care with your greased palms come from? Apparently not.

Comment_arrow

Karyn

1:28 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Mr. Ferrari is correct....there is so much misinformation in Cecil's post it would seem personal. I'm sure he would sing a different tune if he were one of those in the residential area whose buffer zone mysteriously disappeared off the original plan in that infamous "Article 47" fiasco. To blame Mrs. Reed, one of the most upstanding, hard working, and dedicated members of our Planning Board is an injustice and proof he has no clue what he's talking about.

Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

5:10 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Karen and Bob, you claim that I am misinformed in my post. Though neither of you countered with what I am misinformed about. Bob went over that the warehouse should have never been there in the first place and Karyn posted a violation of Article 47. The thread of the posting is the 2013 tax increase. People asked why we have increased taxes and I am merely making the point that some on the planning board may be anti-growth in regards to Tewksbury's commercial tax base. There was a large loss of excise tax and taxes. If you would like to tell us that there was not, I will certainly correct my statement. I have nothing personal in my post. However, claiming that a planning board member is upstanding and hardworking is personal and clearly indicates that you have an agenda. Your claim as to one's character is hardly and argument that I don't know what I am talking about. It's not personal...just political business.

malcolm nichols

11:17 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

When the Town Meeting comes around next time why not show up and say NO. It's easy to say yes, saying no offends people. Next thing you know you are a republican.

Reply

Who Me?

11:26 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

We are also on the high end for commercial rates as well.

Reply

David A.

12:43 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

One of the biggest reasons we have such high residential tax rates is the fact that we don't have the commercial base that many of those other communites have. That is a key factor as to why the percentage of town revenue is overwhelmingly towards the residential...

As a community we have to encourage business to move to Tewksbury or forever bear the weight of the tax burden on the residents...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Who Me?

2:58 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Yes, of course, however we need to look at the overall problem of Tewksbury's debt to population ratio and understand we have spent money we don't have. We are no different than the state or the Federal Government in that we have greatly out spent our revenues.

Comment_arrow

Tom

12:16 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013

And is Home Goods now packing up and leaving?

Karyn

1:43 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

People can sit back and complain but might want to become more involved in the process....there have been public visioning sessions as part of the Town's Master Plan as to what residents want to see as improvements to the center and around Town.....most are poorly attended. Also need to realize that change takes time and there are many hurdles and poorly planned/bad past decisions that have to be rectified. The "highway rest stop" look of the Town is the result of YEARS of poor or lack of planning. Because of this we have a lot of catching up to do. It has only been since the early "2000's" that a 'working' Master Plan has been formulated and goals established 'some' of which have come to fruition, many are still a work in progress. And as another poster said....plan to attend Town Meeting twice a year where decisions get voted on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

4:43 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Great, except I did that and voted against the sewer going on my taxes. I don't use or want it so why should I pay for it? The people in town who made the bad choice of hooking up put it on the ballot and minority of us who were smart and didn't hook up now have to pay for the majorities bad choice! It isn't as easy as you laid out! As Franklin said "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
This is happening all over Tewksbury, Massachusetts and the USA. People make bad choices then cry to have everyone bail them out! I am sick of it!

Cecil Moore

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Dave,

Great response and very accurately described. However, "as a community we have to encourage business to move to Tewksbury, needs to start at the ballot box. We continue to elect board members who are anti-business, anti-growth, and business as usual attitude. We are where we are because that is where we want to be. To pretend differently is merely a foolish exercise in casting blame on everything but ourselves.

Reply

Dan P.

6:12 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

I'm moving to Andover!! Wooooohoooooo!!!!!

Reply

TomH

7:15 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

I wonder how the average residential tax liability in dollars compares between towns. Tewksbury houses tend to cost less than adjacent towns, so I wonder how that affects the avertage tax bill.

Reply

Nick DeSilvio

11:26 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Everyone gets upset after the fact. The questions that need to be asked is why do taxes continue to rise and services continue to go down. Look at where all the revenue goes, salaries, benefits, and pensions. I know people are going to start scream at me saying I hate unions and just want to cut but that not my point. What really needs to be done is to review how municipal employees are compensated. Why is the average private sector employee pay SS and Medicare but public sector employees have there own plans. When people begin to determine that the current formula doesn't work then and only then will the vicious cycle come to an end. Life time pensions doesn't work anymore and life time benefits does work either. People would still take these jobs if there was a different pay and benefit package, lets stop fooling our selves. OK now everyone can start calling me a hater and cheap skate but I only say the truth.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Emerald Court

1:13 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

I agree with you 100%. I also think we need a new town Manager and Tax Dept,

Bob DeVito

12:13 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Nick perfectly said. That is reality.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

6:12 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Bob and Nick,

I remember sitting in a math class when I was a kid and I was running out of time to finish the test. So I took a short cut and peeked at the smart girl's test next to me and wrote down the answer. The next day I was asked to stay after class and told to work out the problem on the chaulk board. I could not and took a 0 for the question. The point being, it is easy to identify the answer but difficult to demonstrate the work it took to get there. I agree with you that salaries, benefits, and pensions are a large consumer our our tax dollars. However, I have no idea where to start. You stated that they need to go on the SS system like the private sector, how would you propose that our town leaders accomplish your proposal? I think we would all be interested to hear the answer. As I understand the pension reform which has be enacted by the Commonwealth, don't the current employees contribute 11-13% of their salaries to the pension system? I believe that SS takes 6.5% and the employer must contribute the other 6%. Does the SS system actually cost the town more money that the current pension system? I just quickly looked up the numbers on the Internet when trying to answer your proposal and seem to be more confused than when I started. Maybe you can clarify? Thanks for your input.

Cecil

Longwood

11:06 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Shut up and pay your taxes. This is your town and you spend the money.
If you can't afford it, earn more money or move to Cambridge.

Reply

Robert Rosa

11:30 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Since we voted to shift the sewer burden from the sewer fund to the town overall, this is the cause of our massive tax increase, the rationale was people would at least be able to write off the additional property taxes when they file their taxes, the only problem with this scenario is the economy is still struggling, and many folks are still out of work, and can't afford any increases. We need to really look at a master fiscal plan to allows the town to paid down debt, which would result in lower taxes for everyone. These types of increases are not sustainable to middle class population.

Reply

Leave a comment