patching...
Update: Get Tewksbury's latest headlines in your inbox each morning—sign up for our daily newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Chart: Local Obesity Rates

How overweight is your community?

 

How overweight is your community? Obesity is defined as having a body mass index greater than 30 kilograms per square meter.

The research, based on 2005 data, was published in the American Journal of Public Health in March 2009.

Check below to see how your community stacks up. 

*This chart appears on all Merrimack Valley Patch sites. Comments you make on the chart, will appear on all sites. 

Community Percent of Obese Adults 
Andover 15.9%
Billerica 24.1%
Chelmsford 20.5%
Dracut 26.8%
Haverhill 25.5%
Littleton 20.6%
Lowell (01850) 25.2%
Lowell (01851) 27%
Lowell (01852) 28.5%
Lowell (01854) 27.2%
Melrose 19.7%
Methuen 27.7%
North Andover 19.2%
North Reading 20.5%
Reading 20.4%
Tewksbury 23.1%
Wakefield 21.1%
Westford 16.6%
Wilmington 22%
Related Topics: Wednesday charts

Vivian Merrill

11:16 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Why do I find it hilarious that Lowell is broken down by zip code? LOL-

Reply

Fitness For You

11:20 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Come down to Fitness For You in North Andover on route 114 across from Merrimack College - come down to the club for a free week trial to get yourself started on the path to a healthier lifestyle today. We have 40 group exercise classes on our schedule that are offered for you during your free week. Mention you saw this on patch and we will throw in a free fitness assessment with a personal trainer.

Reply

denise

12:20 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

I am moving to Andover so i can be skinny!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Rauseo

1:03 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Check out this website to see one possible reason for Andover's low obesity rate.

http://www.andovertrails.org/trails.html

Barry

12:25 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

That picture made my browser crash.

Reply

mike t

12:27 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Another good reason for Tewksbury to spend some money on installing sidewalks for us taxpayers. Let's get this town looking better and our residents healthier by providing them with proper sidewalks throughout the town. Additionally let's require all developers to install granite curbing and sidewalks with each new housing development.

Reply

Joe Veno

1:46 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

I am never going to Lowell again !!!

Reply

Monica Gregoire

1:48 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Please come to the photowalk this Saturday in North Reading's Historic District from 10 am until 12 pm. This event will provide a fun opportunity to work some physical activity into your schedule while learning about photography. Event kicks off in the Flint Memorial Library Activity room at 147 Park Street.

Reply

Kathleen Brothers

1:50 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

As a leader of Tops (Take of Pounds Sensibly), we know there is a big epidemic of overweight people in the community. We are a world wide non profit organization.
There are Chapters in almost every community. We have great success stories, at Tops. Tops Chapters are made up of people just like yourself who want to lose weight. I am in agreement with some of the bloggers who have hinted at exercize. It would be nice to have sidewalks thoughout the town. I am not in agreement with the comic relief remarks. Overweight is a heart breaking problem, I see members struggle with it every week, discouragement, happiness, and tears and laughter. Please do not make light of this problem. Lets hope in the future these numbers come down. They are much to high.

Reply

M

4:43 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

These stats don't say much to me - the Massachusetts obesity rate is 22.6 percent (per livescience.com) and the average of all the above percentiles is 22.7. Most of the towns are very close within a range, and the outliers in the above data seem to be the richest and poorest towns, with the richest the thinnest and the poorest the heaviest. Matches the national stats - states with highest % obese are states like West Virginia (34.3%), Mississippi (32.1%), Louisiana (31.2%), whereas "thinnest" states Include Colorado (20.1%), Utah (21.6%), CT (22.1%), MA, etc.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Laura Kernan

8:53 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Or in other words, Wealth = Health

malcolm nichols

5:52 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The stats tell me something and it seems quite selfevident.

Reply

Ron Powell

7:51 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

This chart is pretty fancy, but if if you really want to impress me, you'll tell me the percentages by town of obese people who are divorced with babies and who are licensed to own a firearm near a coffee chain that has a liquor license.

Reply
Comment_arrow

denise

5:30 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

but...Ron? where do they get their hairdone? (sorry...couldnt resist!)

gail connell

7:32 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

We worry so much about our children being over weight but they only have gym twice a week. In 7th and 8th grade they only have it for half the year. I would like to see it 3 days a week minimal. Clear their minds and give them some energy for their studies.

Reply

Molly

7:45 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

@Gail, I do find it sad that there are so many obese children. To be honest, I am not even sure how that could happen with all the kids in so many sports these days. I personally do not feel it is the school's responsibility or right to govern or worry what our kids eat or do. Having gym 3 days a week is too much. Teacher's have enough to do to teach core subjects. It is absolutely a parents responsibility to monitor what their children eat and activity level that a parent sees fit. My kids are not overweight. We are not super only eat healthy but I feel we have a healthy balance.... Most importantly it is my choice of their healthy balance!

Reply

Dave Miskinis

8:31 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

One in five is obese. Imagine what it is doing to our health care system.

Reply

Dave Miskinis

8:34 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

These stats would be more meaningful if they reflected obesity by age. I suspect that the rate among school-aged children is lower in every case. I'm guessing that the older we get, the higher the %'s are, averaging to these above.

Reply

Sam

8:50 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

You also have to look at what the threshold is for being obese. You would be surprised. Get your BMI done and look at a chart.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

9:47 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Tom - 100% spot on! When I played sports, I was 185# and was considered over weight by the 1830's index used. At 200# I was obese. Most people who know me laughed when I informed them I was obese. The stats for an average guy (5'9") is @140#, my left thigh weights that! If I tried to get to that I would be a skeleton with fat and muscle loss! The charts need to be updated. There are different body types in each area and they ignore that. These charts look simply at weight vs height! Very misleading!

Bob

9:51 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

BMI is the worst way to measure obesity! Here is what it takes into account... "BMI assesses height and weight; muscle mass is not a part of the equation." Muscle weights more than fat which means a body builder would be more obese in many cases than a "fat" person. Athlete's are some of the most "obese" because of the muscle mass they require to play sports! Insane!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Laura Kernan

7:44 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

There are other ways to assess obesity that work for highly muscled individuals, caliper tests and hydrostatic weighing are two. However they are either expensive or very time consuming, so not useful for large populations. For most people BMI works very well. The people for which BMI doesn't work well are elite and professional athletes involved in sports that require bulk muscle mass, think NFL, NHL, body builders. This represents an extremely small portion of the population. When assessing large populations such as towns, states and countries, BMI actually does a pretty good job.

Sam

11:32 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

This is how the government works. Convince everyone that the country is obese and they alone have to protect us from the scourge of obesity. Just more uneeded control and increased government programs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RunningGreen

5:11 am on Friday, March 30, 2012

To be completely honest, the obesity epidemic that we're in will have a major impact on our healthcare system in the future. With the increased rate of diabetes, heart disease, etc., there will be a much greater burden on the system in the long run. There is an issue with the country's weight, you can't argue that.

Dan D.

8:03 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

How is this calculated and by what organization. Does the org have a stake (ok, I almost spelled it "steak"-HA) in the obesity business?

Reply

Laura Kernan

7:17 am on Friday, March 30, 2012

Many of these types of statistics come from the CDC or other large studies done by health organizations. I believe the data for this came from a study published in the American Journal of Public Health from data originating from the MA Dept of Public Health.

http://www.boston.com/yourtown/massfacts/snapshot_percent_obese_in_massachusetts_communities/

Reply

James Perry

8:00 am on Friday, March 30, 2012

Push yourself away from the dinner table...

Reply

Dirk Anderson

9:49 am on Friday, March 30, 2012

I'm moving to Lowell so I will at least LOOK skinnier

Reply

halffull

3:26 pm on Friday, March 30, 2012

what about charting all the under weight(anorexic ) children in the community and doing something about that!! so much talk about over weigh oand no talk about those who are literally dying to make themselves thin.

Reply

Leave a comment