patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

FY 2014 Budget Includes Increases In Water and Sewer Rates

Montuori presents Enterprise Fund budget proposals to Board of Selectmen.

 

Question: Will our water and sewer rates increase next year?

Answer: Last year, when Town Manager Richard Montuori announced water rates would not increase in Fiscal Year 2013, he warned residents not to expect a repeat in FY '14.

So it came as no surprise when, at Tuesday's Board of Selectmen meeting, Montuori announced a six percent increase in water rates, along with an eight percent increase in sewer rates in the FY '14 Budget that takes effect July 1.

The proposed new water rates look like this:

Current Tier Current Rate
0-35,000 gallons $6.67 per 1,.000 gallons
35-70,000 gallons $9.44 per 1,000
71-140,000 gallons $12.30 per 1,000
140,000 - plus $14.31 per 1,000
Proposed Tier Proposed Rate
0-34,000 gallons $7.07 per 1,.000 gallons
35-70,000 gallons $10.01 per 1,.000
71-140,000 gallons $13.04 per 1,.000
140,000 - plus $15.17 per 1,.000

The average family of four that uses roughly 90,000 gallons of water per year, will see their bill jump $48.92. Tewksbury's average water bill, after the increase, is $862 a year. That puts Tewksbury well above the state average ($470) and the average of MWRA communities ($523).

The reason for the increase is largely two-fold. Montuori said there are repairs and upgrades needed at the water treatment plant that will cost around $1,275,000 and water usage, overall, has gone down, according to Montuori. He said the town will look to pay $675,000 of the costs associated wih the water treatment plant improvements out of the retained earnings account in the Water Enterprise Fund and borrow the other $600,000.

The reatained earnings account i ssimilar to a stabilization fund in the general budget and is used for one-time capital expenses.

The sewer rate proposal looks like this:

Current Tier Current Rate Proposed Rate
0-35,000 gallons $6.55 per 1,.000 gallons $7.07 per 1,000 gallons
35-70,000 gallons $8.43 per 1,000 $9.10 per 1,000
71-140,000 gallons $11.53 per 1,000 $12.45 per 1,000
140,000 - plus $13.49 per 1,000 $14.57 per 1,000

Ongoing interest payments on the $100 million sewer expansion project is fueling the rate increase, as is decreased revenue from connection fees.

The average family of four, using putting 90,000 gallons of waste through the system each year will see their bill jump $60.20 per year to $816.98. That's just below the MWRA average ($823) but well above the state average ($638).

As part of his presentation to the board, Montuori also mapped out capital improvement projects that will need to be addressed in the water and sewer infrastructure over the next five years. Most of those projects will be able to be paid for through the retained earnings accounts for the Water Enterprise Fund and Sewer Enterprise Fund.

Montuori's complete presentation to the Board of Selectmen on water and sewer can be found attached to this story as a PDF file.

About this column: You Ask … Patch Answers is a weekly column for locals looking for solutions to community problem or issues -- from public nuisances, to eye-sores, to local mysteries. If you have a question, a query, a gripe about a public problem in Tewksbury, send it to Bill Gilman at williamg@patch.com and our team of intrepid reporters will dig up an answer. If your question appears in our column you will be entered into a drawing to receive a restaurant gift certificate. Related Topics: Enterprise Funds, Richard Montuori, Sewer Rates, retained earnings, and warer rates

Comment_arrow

steve

6:38 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

wow I will have to go and get a third job,can not wait to move from this town.Time to tell the kids to shower every other day and stink for a day.

Just Me

7:21 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

This is why we are thinking of leaving Tewksbury enough is enough

Reply

NLR

7:22 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Are you kidding me? How is it that we have the highest rates on everything and have nothing to show for it?
So, because water usage is down, (people are trying to conserve water), we have to pay more? When will the town realize we cannot afford more? The answer is never,

Reply

me

7:42 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

This Town is absolutely ridiculous. We pay way to much for what we get.
How do they expect people to afford all these increases!!!

Reply

NLR

7:44 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

We honestly can't afford this. Everything is going up at such a rate that we're havivg to make difficult choices just to get by. Do we heat the house this month or do we try to fill the refrigerator. We need help, not higher taxes, it's really time to stop this trend.

Reply

Gordon Pickguard

7:56 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

I'm shocked... shocked to find that gambling is going on in there

Reply

malcolm nichols

7:57 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Worse yet, we still have to borrow more money just to pay for ongoing maintenence. The rates need to be increased further to cover at least the $600k to eliminate future debt.

Reply

Joe Bill

8:05 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

For what you pay in this town in taxes and fees, you get next to nothing for services. This town has been mismanaged for years and Montouri is not changing that trend. For those of you who are complainign about being taxed to death, if you voted Democrat, you reap what you sew and it's going to get far worse. Thank you for electing Marxists on every level of government.

Reply

Richard Menard

8:13 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

What a great way to start my weekend! Re-invigorates me as I head out on the campaign trail! Time for an independent voice representing the people to work on getting these rates under control....April 6th is coming soon, get out and VOTE!

Reply

Bob

8:30 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

When I moved in 17 years ago my yearly water bill was $240! This year it will be @$600! For the same usage. Pathetic!

Reply

Dan

8:43 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Seems we can't afford to keep a fire-station opened all year, streets in real good shape, how about that job done on the corner of main and Shawsheen, nice bump there. Fixed and it's worse..Just paid a bunch in excise tax for my Old cars, doesn't that go to the town??? Gov wants to Raise More taxes,Less take home pay, how much you spending on Gas lately!!!Yeah we're working to Help the middle class!!!Hear about any Pol's paying more for bennies??? Just like the Federal Gov, they NEVER get enough, but they keep getting voted in!!!

Reply

Concerned Parent

8:47 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

How is that usage goes down so they decide to charge more? That is completely ridiculous!

Reply

Jake P

8:49 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

M Menard,
Please tell me your thoughts on getting these rates under control. I've heard enough politicians with their promises. Here is your chance. I am intrigued with you as a candidate, but would love to hear your plan!

Reply

Mike

8:53 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

So Mayberry(oops, Tewksbury) decides to raise another set of taxes. What a shock. This town is bleeding its residents dry while businrss continue to leave and empty stores are as popular as fire hydrants. People should be fleeing this town like it's on fire. Oh, and by the way, make sure you check that increased mortgage payment you nowhave. The town was not only nice enough to raise property taxes but they also decided now was a good time to update house assessments. My tasaxes went up over $400 for this year. Another Tewksbury money grab

Reply

Tom DeVeau

9:01 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Wait a minute...did Montouri really say that since the residents are conserving water in order to keep their personal costs down, they are rewarded with this increase? I am no politician, but I can't imagine that was the right way to approach this. Some of the highest water, sewer, property, commercial rates and taxes in the state and still have more empty buildings, closed fire departments, potholes, etc than any town near us. Government spending is a joke from the top down. Middle class won't recover until the government is overthrown and starts over with the bare necessities and learns how to control spending.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

9:09 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

They do the water and sewer budget like a business. Their cost is X and they need usage of Y to to get to that X. Unlike any business, they don't lower costs when usage goes down. They do what all governments does and come back to the people well of cash!

Mike

9:05 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Come on everyone, maybe we should lay off the comments about lost businesses. Tewksbury did just entice a gun shop to open. Do I hear marijuana dispensary next, anyone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul hartnett

10:32 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Actually Tewksbury did not entice a gun shop. The owners already owned a business on that property. They have worked very hard to re-establish themselves to survive. Believe me the Town gave them no incentive. I am a former Tewksbury business owner and I can tell you first hand, doing business in this town is difficult. With all the empty stores and lots there should be enticements.

Kelly smith

9:22 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

I think Montuori should live in Tewksbury and pay some of these taxes I
He has implemented.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julia

9:30 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

AMEN! I drove 2 kids to 2 different schools the other day- should have seen all the NH license plates- Superintendent, Montouri, none live here so nothing is truly vested in improving things.

Comment_arrow

Joe Bill

7:23 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Good point. Wouldn't that be fair? Instead just like any other politician he is making decisions that cost you money that he is not subject to. Granted he is not elected but the imbeciles in this town just signed this buffoon to a new contract.

Julia

9:25 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Worst mistake I ever made moving here. Driving down East Street is just plain shameful. Didn't we receive all sorts of $$ to fix roads? Is THAT what you call fixing? Shame, shame, shame on the people who supposedly RUN this town- most of whom do not have the "priviledge" of being residents.

Reply

Julia

9:27 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

The logic of raising water rates because we are using less is JUST EXACTLY one of the many reasons why this town will never get any better. Didn't it come to anyone's attention that the reason we are using less water is because we couldn't afford the last rate hike? Duh!

Reply

Dave

9:35 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Town manager makes approx 170k a year which is probably 2-3 times the average of most families in town. Can you say out of touch with the realities the rest of us struggle with. No vacation for the family for the third year in a row because my taxes, bills, and cost of living are way too high around here. Sad situation!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

12:37 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Why is the town manager making 170K/year? Was he hired to help the people or just to continue down the path of "tax 'em to death"?
First special interest groups have been popping up regularly to get tax increases passed. Then increases like this are dropped on us. Have you really had enough? If so, isn't it time to show up at EVERY town meeting where the topic of budgets are discussed and/or voted on and put an end to this? Take Back Tewksbury!

JoAnn Brace

9:40 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Give me a break. My family can not afford to live in this town. I am still trying to catch with up with last year's increase.

Reply

Cygarbuff

9:44 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

The reason water usage went down is due to the water/sewer price gouging over the last few years. Did they really think we would continue to use as much water or not find other resources? Cause and effect.

Reply

Michael Adams

10:12 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Somethings need to change in this community or we are in deep deep doo doo, and right now we are sliding down that slope....House values are down, taxes are up, services are on the chopping block, 38 is a ghost town when it comes to commercial properties. When conserving translates into paying more, well, can the end be really far behind? We have how much in reserves? Wilmington has millions??

Reply

paul hartnett

10:17 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Just like all of you I am discouraged by this news. We all have been trying to conserve on water due to the increased rates. Those of us who are on both water & sewer are feeling the most pain. The fact is, people in this town voted for the expansion of the sewer system and the costs associated with it (I did not). It may have sounded like a good idea at the time. The payment for this was based on the assumption that we would use more water not less.

In addition, our re-taxes keep increasing and home values have been decreasing.
So the only recourse is to move out, but try to find a buyer. This can be virtually impossible unless you are willing to give your home away. Most of us are stuck.

Expansion is a good thing but there are limits. We should not spend more than we can afford. I wish people would think about this before they vote to spend money we don't have.

Reply
Comment_arrow

janet

3:46 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Paul,
I believe everyone pays for water and sewer regardless if you are hooked up or not.
I know because I pay and don't have it
Janet

Comment

11:01 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

I think the lowest rate (under 35K gallons) should remain unchanged to promote water conservation. There should be some reward for those who actively conserve to try to control their water/sewer costs to prevent having to pay an increased rate.

Reply

Richard Menard

11:07 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

To Jake, and anyone else who is listening. I want to do the simplest thing to help ease this burden....follow the advise of the committee that put the sewer together and bond it for 30 years as opposed to 20. The town was in a different place, along with the rest of the country, with the economy. We are cutting services because this is now not only on the users, but also the tax base. The materials in the ground are going to last for decades after it's paid off, why should we suffer now for a plan that will benefit future generations and increased home owners. Hopefully the town will become desirable again for transplants like myself if we can get these costs under control and our user base will grow. I am not an expert, but I know when we needed a new roof on the house, refinancing my mortgage was an option....pay more in the long run, but the leaks needed to stop and the kids still needed food on the table. Cutting services and over burdening our residents should be a last measure, despite what some of my opponents are saying.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gordon Pickguard

11:53 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

"Over burdening our residents ?" You don't think our residents are already over burdened ? "Cutting services should be a last measure ?" If you don't think that we should cut services, where should we cut ? How should the "burden" of the cost of municipal government be reconciled ?

Richard Menard

11:13 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

Follow the advice, not "advise" (iPad doesn't let me scroll back to proofread). I did the roof myself with some friends, just using that as an example of taking a common sense approach to things and listening to those who may know more than yourself. My father would be embarrassed if he found out his son couldn't swing a hammer and put down some shingles to save his family some cash!

Reply
Comment_arrow

malcolm nichols

1:03 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Borrowing money is almost always the wrong answer, borrowing more or financing longer is even more wrong. The answer is to save the money and set aside for the maintenance. The fact that we have not saved the money to maintain our water system is shameful. We have spent frivolously on many upgrades over the past 10 years which we are now complaining about. The time for complaining is over.

Just don't come back and say "how about another new school or perhaps a new football stadium?".

As an aside if you could take some or all of the old debt and consolidate the current rates should be substantially lower than old existing.

Who Me?

12:22 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

The power to tax is the power to destroy, John Marshall.

I'll keep saying this to the bitter end, water and sewer rates have nothing to do with usage. It has everything to do with folks who were stupid enough to allow the Enterprise Fund to be set up in the first damn place.

Enterprise Funds are actually slush funds, exempt from the controls of Prop 2 1/2. Enterprise Funds are used as back door tax increases.

When the TM got caught adding the Dog Catcher's salary to the Water Sewer Enterprise budget it became the metaphor for how spending can be hidden by these Enterprise Funds.

So I guess at some point we will have the highest water and sewer rates in Massachusetts, we are already at # 2.

AS Toqueville was credited with saying "People get the Government they deserve" it is the people who must accept responsibility for the bloated and crushing Government that can't get out of it's own way.

Next time someone wonders why we can't get businesses to come to Tewksbury you can put these soaring water and sewer rates at the top of the list.

But, then again, does anyone really care.

Who Me?
Malcontent and all around general nusiance.

Reply

LP

12:32 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

We can barely afford living now..
wtf?

Reply

me

12:53 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Isn't that nice that Mr. Montuori is going to "award" the Tewksbury Residents another increase. I think maybe Tewksbury should look into cleaning house. Instead of taxing the residents. So do I buy food this week?? or do I pay my bills....hhmmm....What should we tell our children because we can't afford to do any extra's because we have more increasing taxes and water rates. I know that my pay certainly hasn't increased. STOP TAXING AND INCREASING RATES IN THE TOWN AND LETS LOOK AT OTHER AREA'S THAT WE CAN CUT!

Reply

SD From T-Bury

2:20 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

We are struggling with the outrageous tax rates and water/sewer rates in this town. The rates have been financially crippling. It's almost like we're being punished for living in Tewksbury. We can't keep up! We are not money fountains! The town leaders can't just bleed us every time they discover a mix-up in the books. Enough already!

Reply

Julia

3:05 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Someone posted the salaries of town employees in the last week or so on the Patch. How about we trim some of the fat- have you seen some of those salaries? Did you know these salaries come with a low cost health package with tiny co-pays...How about you? My health insurance has a $5,000 deductible for my family and I pay a HUGE amount every week to be covered....Trim some of the fat and no, I am not dissing anyone on that list individually, all I am saying is that in a town this size the budget for salaries alone was close to 300 MILLION- WTH???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave

3:12 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Julia look again the budget is no where near 300 million. I think the total town budget for everything is under 100 million.

Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

3:48 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Julia,

You bring up an interesting issue in regards to municipal healthcare. It is a tremendous burden to the tax payer and a large consumption on Tewksbury's budget. You seem to be in the know with your posting. Which town employees get a "low cost healthcare package with tiny co-pays". Is there a tiered type of caste system in town with different categories of employees paying different rates? I would like to know if you have the actual information or are just frustrated and really don't know what you are posting. We need factual numbers so that we can call our elected selectmen. BS and misinformation allowed us to get in this situation in the first place.

Julia

3:20 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Sorry Dave, you are correct, I hit an extra "0":

Someone posted the salaries of town employees in the last week or so on the Patch. How about we trim some of the fat- have you seen some of those salaries? Did you know these salaries come with a low cost health package with tiny co-pays...How about you? My health insurance has a $5,000 deductible for my family and I pay a HUGE amount every week to be covered....Trim some of the fat and no, I am not dissing anyone on that list individually, all I am saying is that in a town this size the budget for salaries alone was close to 30 MILLION- WTH???

Reply

Dan

3:43 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Town managers phone number, at the town hall....978-640-4300.....Give a call and leave a message....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lol

4:37 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

As if he or any of the town officials care.

Richard Menard

4:12 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Malcolm, I agree with you...it is almost always the wrong answer. I have no car payments nor credit card debt because I know that lesson all too well. However, a large purchase like a sewer system is a little different as I'm sure you'll agree. As much as I would like to, I couldn't pay cash for my house either. I do like your idea of consolidated debt for better rates, something I would explore if elected next month. I'm listening to the people, we all have a stake in this....I'm not running to make friends at town hall, I'm running to speak up for all of us who haven't given up hope yet.

Reply

Dave G.

5:31 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

How can Mr. Montuori or our town selectman do this with no regrets. Did they try and look for ways to trim the budget. Everyone has a budget and lives within it. We where told the sewer project would be self supporting. What happend to that promise? An 80% increase is insane.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

6:48 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Dave,

I share your dismay. However, did you vote at the town meeting when the sewer was approved? If you voted yes, did you read the proposal in its entirety? Because if you or anyone else in here did...this is not a surprise in the least. In fact, I am surprised that our rates are not higher. The proposal was horrendously written, the financing was not favorable, and the plan far too ambitious. It was far too complex for the average voter to understand. The proponents of town meeting say that town meeting works. Well in this case it doesn't...because it didn't work. The selectmen, of which Doug Sears is the only one still sitting, knew it would increase rates 5-fold. They lowered the betterment fee, connections costs, and made it "optional" hookup. This was so that it would pass at town meeting. They knew the rates would skyrocket and never notified the voters. It was up to the voters to read the article before they voted, which obviously very few did. They town got EXACTLY what was approved. No one should be shocked.

Comment_arrow

Dave G.

8:05 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Hi Cecil,

I voted no on the sewer project. I just had a feeling this would happen. Once you hook up yo it you are at there mercy. They can then do what thay want and tell you that you voted for it. Be careful what you wish for.

Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

9:26 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Good Morning Dave G,

I voted no as well and attempted to tell everyone I knew to vote no. The funding portion was based on an economic scenario that only exists in a college classroom. There was too small of a margin allotted for cost overruns and the plan did not project feasibility for self sustainment. I read the article and I saw this. Why didn't everyone else? In fact I praise our Town Manager Richard Montouri for keeping the rates as low as they are. Yes, I said low! Please tell me, after you read the article, how we can be in any different position than we are? The writing was on the wall and the majority chose to ignore. I repeat, Tewksbury got exactly what we voted for. Period.

Julia

6:38 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Cecil: I am not "one in the know" but I DO know people that work for our fair town. I assure you that I am NOT one to pass on "BS and misinformation". I would urge you to look into it if you feel the need. I am certainly not misinformed or trying to start a fire where there is no ember. I DO know that the town healthcare is a MUCH better package than the average person.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

8:25 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Julia,

I apologize if you took my question as accusatory in nature. You wrote "low cost healthcare and tiny co-pays". Did you not? A reasonable and educated deduction would lead me to believe you know the cost and co-pays incurred by the Tewksbury Town Employees. Why else would you write that if you didn't know? How would you write something criticizing healthcare cost and co-pays when you have no idea what they are? Then you followed up that you are not "one in the know". So following your words led me to conclude that you are full of BS and misinformation. Am I missing something here?

Cecil Moore

7:01 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Julia,

The problem being what you describe as "the average person". The question has to be asked, do the Tewksbury Town Employees get a lower cost health care than the Wilmington Town Employees, or Billerica, or Andover? Am I going to sit at home and be upset over the fact that Bill Gates gets better health care coverage than me? What is "average" to him? Donald Trump, Beyonce, Tom Brady? I have no idea what you do? Lets say for sake of argument that you are a computer programmer. Would "average" for your industry be other computer programmers? Would you seek the same benefit package as healthcare professionals? So if you want to stay angry and upset over comparing apples to dump trucks....please continue to do so. But in fairness to the people who patch my streets, protect my safety, and pick up my garbage...lets stick to comparing apples to apples. What do the other communities pay their municipal employees who do the SAME work? Isn't that fair?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave

8:15 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

I agree Cecil, Julia is making an assumption that town workers get better healthcare than everyone else. There are plenty of people out there with great insurance some people I know actually have 100% paid health insurance. I'm sure the benefits of town workers are pretty comparable to other decent places to work, but they are not free for the worker or anything crazy like that. This really should not turn into another way to bash the teachers, cops firefighters and all other town employees. They have nothing to do with this problem. They did not create it anymore than a worker in Wilmington or Billerica. All they want to do is go to work, do their job, and provide for their families just like everyone else.

Comment_arrow

Julia

8:57 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Current copays=less than $25 per visit= tiny. My educated and reasonabe deduction is that you are either a town employee or close relative of one and HEY, that's fine by me, after all, I am full of BS and misinformation. Believe what you will, but I know what I know and I know the current health care offered in our town, for town employees is both low cost with low co-pays (i.e. tiny). Thanks for listening. I'm done.

Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

9:27 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Julia,

Hopefully you are in the administrative side of the leading college where you work. Is there an employer, private or public, who wouldn't want to "trim the fat" out of their budgets? Sorry that your deductive reasoning has failed you. I retired from the printing industry years ago. I don't know any police or fire personally. However, my great x 3, uncle was a firefighter in Chicago in 1857. At least that is what ancestory.com revealed to me. When I negotiated my last contract, I asked for the same package that our competitor was paying a similar executive with the same job subscription. Do you feel that is a logical request? Would it have been logical for me to ask for the same compensation package as a brain surgeon from Mass General? No. You made an assertion concerning health care costs. I merely asked you if it was comparable to our surrounding communities with the same job subscription. As far as my defense of municipal employees? They clean up society's crap and for that I am greatful.

Comment_arrow

Dave

9:28 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

You know it really is sad that a conversation can't happen on this site without the pay and benefits of town workers being attacked. If the jobs are so great go out an get one in Tewksbury or some other town. There are plenty of jobs in Teaching, public works, and police and fire exams every year. If it is so great join the ranks. They pay for their benefits and I'm sorry Julia if the insurance happens to be better than yours. Not all jobs are the same. I would love an annual bonus of 40k like my brother gets every August, or company paid trips like my sister in law, but oh well that is what their employers offer. This is a classic case of middle class workers coming under fire, yet again.

Julia

8:29 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Wow, you guys are not getting me at all. I'm not bashing anyone, I have teachers and policemen in my family...not to mention a trash truck driver. What I AM saying is that comparable to the"high deductible -health savings account" types of health insurance that seem to be they way big companies are going for their workers to save THEM money, our town's insurance is one of the better out there- that is all I am saying, If you are an HR person looking to save your bottom line, one of the first things you do is look into ways to shave health benefits- the costs are out of control. All I meant with my previous "trim the fat" post was there are ways to do that which do not involve raising taxes, assessments OR water rates every 6 months on townspeople. I stated earlier, I am not bashing anyone on the town payroll, so please do not attack someone's opinion. I work for one of the leading colleges in the country and our bennies are in no way comparable to our small towns.

Reply

Rusty

12:02 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

There is NO WAY we will vote for any incumbent in the next town election unless they terminate the town manager ASAP.and refinance the sewer bonds.

Reply

The Truth

9:48 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Here are the facts. Total project approximately $100 million dollars ( Water $20 million/Sewer $80 million). The work has been done and the town has to pay the bills. End of story and there is no way around it. You can blame the sitting Selectman at the time because they were not honest with the residents when it went to Town Meeting to get approved. They knew the bettermen fee needed to be around $10-12 thousand dollars and mandatory hookupfor residents but knew it would never pass at Town Meeting so they came up with $3000 to get the project thru. To add insult to injury, here is how Cressman and selectman at the time decided to finance the project. Imagine a variable rate where the first ten years are extremely low and favorable and that was our first ten years of payments for the project. Now we are on the back end of our loan and the majority of it is due so we have to pay these ridiculously high rates. Now the real aggravating part of this situation is that we CANNOT refinance this loan until 2017. Cressman and the sitting Selectman at the time with their short sighted vision and defering payments have now saddled the town with this financial albatross. Stop blaming Montouri and current Selectman for these problems. They are left standing with the smoking gun and have to deal with it after Cressman and former selectman fired it. No candidate is going to come in and lower these rates becasue the bill is due and there is no way around this issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gordon Pickguard

10:16 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

We voted for those rubes,hicks and inbred farm boys who brought us David Cressman. Let's be more careful now, and in the future that our votes go only to those who have the acumen and will, to reconcile municipal finances. Right now it's all unsustainable and I haven't heard any of them present a solution. This about more than just water and sewer.

Joe Bill

10:23 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Can we petition for Montouri's resignation?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

10:35 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Joe Bill,

On what grounds are you calling for his resignation?

Mary Ellen Fernald

10:50 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Get a petition going, I will be the first to sign it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

11:00 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Ms. Fernald,

As a candidate for selectman, I hope that you would be able to articulate the reason why you would advocate the removal of our Town Manager? I cannot wait to hear who you would support hiring in his replacement. My excitement is heightened in anticipation on hearing your plan the resurrect our finances from the mistakes of the past? Will you be putting a plan on here for us all to see?

Comment_arrow

Karyn

1:32 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Very surprising that a wannabe Selectman candidate would make such a statement to "get rid of him" rather than work with him. Mr. Montuori isn't the problem. The people were deceived by those responsible at the time and he inherited the mess left behind. The debt was incurred, and now the bill is due. Time to pay the piper.

Comment_arrow

Michael Iannacci

5:17 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

How to Lose an Election With a Single Post ..... The Memoirs of Mary Ellen Fernald

Joe Bill

11:25 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

I would advocate for it because he is Obviously doing a poor job as evidenced by the shape this town is in. His reign has resulted in no noticeable positive change. In the private sector people lose their jobs for this type of performance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Adams

6:13 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

who was on the committee to pick him? Next time lets make residency a requirement! Might as well feel the pain too, of course at a $170K, it isn't gonna hurt to bad.

Comment_arrow

Karyn

8:07 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Cressman, who was a main contributing factor to our current situation was both Town Manager AND a Town resident for over 20 years and what good did that do? The old regime still didn't get rid of him though many in town agreed he was terrible. Again, Mr. Montuori inherited the mess left in his wake and has only been at the helm for I believe three years.

Who Me?

11:27 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Printing career.....self made Business Man.....Software Engineer.....ahhhhh....Man I just can't keep up with all of this.....so darn confusing.....

But then Malcontents aren't the best thinkers............

Reply

Dave

12:54 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

I agree Mr. Montouri is not really the one to blame on this issue. The former manager and former Selectman set us up for problems and then passed the buck to new leadership. My only issue with Montouri is his butchering of the fire department. I'm sure he has done other undesirable things but I can't blame him for the sewer mess. It was dumped on his lap, no pun intended.

Reply

irishSue

7:40 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Some here seem to think the town manager is the problem, maybe, maybe not. What I see is a new "old school network" starting to take shape. Palimeno, Wilson, Wentworth (who is a candidate for bos), Graffeo, they all come from the same table, call me paranoid, but we only have to look back the last 20 or so years ago and see what that old school network gave us. To answer a poster question from earlier, I believe Mr Wentworth was on the selection committee for town manager so maybe he can give you some thoughts on the selection and where we our now. I'd like to see a candidate question and answer series here on patch, what do say Mr Gilman?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

8:33 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

IrishSue,

Is it the pints of Guiness or shots of Bushmills? Are you saying that a school committee member, a town clerk, a selectman, and selectman candidate are somehow part of a conspiracy to take over the town? Krispy Polimeno was this years's recipient of the Commonwealth's school committee member of the year, town Clerk Graffeo inherited a total melt down of the town Clark's office and transformed it into a professional accountable working office, Selectman Wilson seems to work hard and is not afraid to take on controversial issues that other board members refuse to address, and Candidate Wentworth's has not been elected to anything, nor has released much of a platform. Yet somehow you associate these individuals as a good old boy network? I will call you paranoid, delusional, deranged, and drunk. Richard Montouri inherited a financial disaster that was not of his making and has done a solid job in making the best of a losing situation. You have painted some hard working people with your dirty brush in a very negative light. It will do no good for them to come on here and answer your questions. Paranoid minds only here what they want to here.

Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

8:36 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

My apologies for spell check. That would be School Committee Member Krissy Polimeno.

Comment_arrow

Bob

11:00 am on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Sue, I know all you listed and I have to say I think you are way off base. I don't agree with them on several issues and have said so but never have I felt that they don't have the best interest of the town in mind. Again, I have disagreed many times with their proposals etc. but I never questioned their commitment to making Tewksbury a better community to live in.

Comment_arrow

Scott Wilson

10:16 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

Strange post Irish Sue. There are plenty of opportunites for all people in this community to get involved. Polimeno sits on the SC, Graffeo is the sitting town clerk and I am a sitting BOS. The connection we share is seeing Tewksbury thrive and become a great community. It is a shame that because people step up and get involved, they get criticized. Feel free to critize decisions I've made but there is no need for you to attack me or anyone else who chooses to get involved and work hard for this community.

For anyone to suggest that Richard Montuori is the problem, is ridiculous. If you have paid attention and watched the issues that he has dealt with you will see that he is making them better. He didn't vote to spend the money for the sewer, the water improvements, the New HS, the Police Station, the Library, the Senior Center, the Wynn School......he did take the job inheriting this debt and putting a plan in place to get us out of this mess.

irishSue

9:34 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Cecil, Typical man, I didn't paint them with anything, you have. I just made an observation. I also stated I may be paranoid, you sir, are. In the context of your last sentence, the word is hear, not here. Goodnight.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

10:07 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Irish,

An observation is saying that those people are new to town politics. What you did was a condemnation by calling them good ol' boys. You labeled them with your words. For example, linking you to alcohol consumption was an condemnation. Seeing that you can use spell check to correct my use of a word is an observation. Confused?

Dan

2:47 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013

Found the paragraph from the Town Crier interesting. Further water usage is Down between more accurate meters and conservation efforts on the part of ratepayers, which Also Drives UP the Costs in a system that utilizes economics of scale. The Less water used counter intuitively the MORE water Costs the community in order to reach budget thresholds to pay down the debt..Goes on to say More Good News with a 6% increase next year. Don't like it??? Residents that neglect to pay their water bills face 14 percent interest on unpaid balances and liens on their property taxes...Can you say French Revolution???

Reply

Richard Menard

3:30 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

I have received the information regarding the bonds from the sewer project, and sadly...it seems that "the Truth" was correct. Our prior boards chose to handcuff us with what seems to be a difficult financial situation for at least 3 to 4 years (2016 is the first bond that can be called in). There is also a page regarding Sutton Brook and our mandated payments for the future. Tewksbury was found to be 22% responsible from what the data indicates. Normally I would redact names and contact information but the format doesn't allow my software to alter the pages. Please direct questions to the Town Manager or Town Treasurer if you have questions about the information. I was not asked to keep anything confidential so I assume that this is free for public consumption. http://www.richardmenard.org/images/12580/201303080917.pdf

Reply

Who Me?

3:42 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

Tewksbury's bill for Sutton Brook was tabbed at 10 Million Dollars. Some sort of "credits" may reduce it a bit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard Menard

6:20 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

correct, the pdf says we are looking at $347,479 a year for the next 25 years to pay it off. It was also explained to me that the Town will then take ownership of the property.

Leave a comment