patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

LETTER: Candidates' Character Shines Through at Forum

Reader says her decisions have been made easier.

 

To the Editor:

I am not writing to push a vote for any person in particular, but to reiterate what I would consider to be common sense.  After the very telling “Candidates Night” at Tewksbury Country Club, I am seriously concerned about the lack integrity and character in SOME of the candidates.

I have to say that some of the candidates seem to be just plain too immature for the seat that they are campaigning for.  This is not high school, folks.  Stop “bashing” your opponents.  It is time to grow up!  Fine, you made a “mistake” in your past, you got caught – either tell me how you’ve learned from it or get over it.  Anything after the word “but” is bull.  Don’t stand in a crowded room and tell me that everything is someone else’s fault or give nasty looks at your opposition as you admit to certain issues that are less than glowing about the office you are running for.  Stop with the excuses.  Don’t sit there and roll your eyes as your opponent is addressing the crowd and don’t mock your opposition for running against you.

Fine, I agree that there are things “wrong” with our Town – I need not mention the numerous issues that need to be addressed, I believe that all of our candidates have covered pretty much every issue.  Stop telling your OPINION of why something is broke (I am sure we all have one already) and instead tell me how YOU intend to fix it.  You don’t have to be innovative on every level, folks.  If something has worked for this Town, do it again.  If something has not worked, move on.   I have to say, things have been progressing in this Town, there is still a lot of work to be done, but we appear to be moving in a forward direction, the blame game is a step backwards. 

What I saw on Tuesday evening was more telling than any letters or “comment” sections.  In the Town Clerk race, one of the candidates gave glaring looks at one of her opposition during her speech, seated to her left as she spoke, and one of the other candidates did nothing but “bash” both of her two opponents.  The BOH race, one of the candidates rolled his eyes consistently as his opponent spoke instead of acknowledging there are more objectives to the BOH than one issue.  The Housing race, although one of the candidates appeared to be more suited for the job, he mocked his opponent for running against him at the end of his speech.  And one of the candidates for the BOS race spent more time focusing on ‘explaining away’ his past errors than on the issues that face this Town.  What is most troubling with the actions of those above show me that they are so self-absorbed that they show no respect towards the fact there may be opponents whose ideas should be looked into if they happen to be voted into the seat they are seeking.  The irony of those referred to above is each one of them stressed the importance of “working together” and “working as a team for the betterment of the Town”.  It would be funny if these seats did not require such efforts.

Although Tuesday evening was not a “Debate”, it was very telling all the same.  I had time, both before and after each candidate addressed the crowd to speak directly with them.  Due to what was said (both to me and to the residents) and HOW it was said has clearly defined my decisions for this Saturday (some of which I was on the fence about). 

I honestly don’t care why something is broke; just show me how to fix it.  Thank you to Tewksbury Patch and Tewksbury Country Club for making (at least this resident’s) voting decision clear.

OK, folks – before beginning the “bashing” of my letter, please watch the re-broadcast of this “Candidates Night” (granted you won’t see EVERYTHING that I allude to here) and form an educated opinion.  I’m just hoping this opportunity to see the candidates TRUE CHARACTER does not go unnoticed before Saturday.  Our Town's immediate and quite possibly long-term future depend on these people.  It matters to me.

Jennifer Nagle

Tewksbury

About this column: Tewksbury Patch will provide continuing coverage of the 2011 Municipal Election, up to and including Election Night results and reaction. Related Topics: Campaign, Election, Letter to the Editor, Vote, Voting, and integrity

Kathleen Brothers

8:40 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Jennifer, thank you for your very intelligent letter to the editor. Being one of the candidates that you mention in your letter I wasn't able to see the "rolling of eyes". I am glad that I couldn't. I went up there to tell the voters, from my heart, why I was running, my background, and what I thought were the duties of the BOH. I hope others were able to take in what you took in and be wise in there choices tomorrow. Like I said in my speech I am not in a POPULARITY contest, and I think some of the candidates think they are. Thanks again for you insite.....

Reply

Jonathan Ciampa

8:42 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Well said!!! I was grateful for the chance to see all of the candidates live and in person in a neutral setting and see how they behaved. My mind was made up on several of the contested races based on what I saw and heard that night.

Thanks you TCC and Patch for setting this up and I hope next year more residents will take advantage of the opportunity to come down and experience this event for themselves.

Reply

Mary Ellen Fernald

9:10 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Jennifer, You said it all! Thank you.

Reply

Scott Wilson

9:46 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Great letter Jenn. You nailed it.

Reply

Jamison Tomasek

10:09 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

I don't think this letter is correct at all. First someone in this town needs to get their act together and have a proper debate (to-do list for 2012). I was at that event and it was okay, but I bet the number of undecided people at this event is less than 1 in 10. How many people will watch it on TV? No one knows. Debates often draw more interest. What the writer doesn't realize is that in order to say how you would fix something, you need to state how it's broken. If you think you are the person to fix it, then you have to call out the person that broke it. Civility in political campaigns only strengthens the status quo- change requires getting people excited. What you did see was the current town clerk making a political error. What she should have said was "everything is great in the TC office and it's running like a clock. customer satisfaction is at an all time high." Instead she did not come off particulary well in both content and style.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jennifer Nagle

11:30 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Tewksbury1000, with all due respect, no this was not a debate but a JOB INTERVIEW. With us (the community of Tewksbury) being the potential employer, knowing that everyone in Town would have the ability to review the "interviews" (as the moderator of this event informed us), you would think more class and tact would be evident in those referred to above. Seriously, being a lone resident with an open mind and hope for positive direction in this Town, SOME of these "potential employees" would have been shown the door well before the first minute of their speech was over, never mind the other 4 minutes afforded to them.

Maybe you went to this event with your undying support for a specific candidate(s) and no matter what was said or in what manner it was said, you would not change your mind. I did not (lucky me). It is possible that you are inferring that one of my observations noted above is a derogatory characterization towards the candidate(s) that you are supporting. I specifically did not mention names so residents of this Town can watch the event themselves and come to their own decisions as I did.

Hopefully that is all that will come of this letter. I hear, far too often, people asking "who should I vote for in "X" race?", or other ignorant remarks. I would rather have a low turnout of votors that actually KNOW who / why the are voting, than a high turnout of votors that are doing what "someone" told them to do. JMO

Scott Wilson

10:35 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Anyone can put together a debate. Maybe you'll do it next year.

Unfortunately too many candidates said they didn't want to do a debate.

I don't agree that you need to call out the person that broke it. I think you talk about how you are going to make things better. Don't focus on the negative, focus on the positives you can bring to the situation.

Reply

Jamison Tomasek

11:34 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Of course candidates don't want to debate. For the incumbent it is a better strategy to not debate. Look how long Micelli resisted it. You have to create a situation where they feel compelled to show up.

As to stay positive, don't crticize. But what if you are a casual voter? You are a selectman and deep into what is going on. The average person proably doesn't see a need for improvement if their contact with the TC office has been satisifactory. A candidate needs to draw a strong contrast.

I also want to point out that you yourself called out the current TC. As it is clear that you are not impartial, it could be seen as a proxy for your candidate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jennifer Nagle

12:15 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

"casual voter"?? An oxymoron and a very scary thought at the same time.

Also, I'm not in any political seat, but an "educated voter". I had no pre-disposed notion of the seat for Town Clerk (honestly wasn't a big deal to me) until I did a small amount of my own research (and no, not in the comment sections of TI) and followed up with the character each candidate portrayed during "Candidates Night". That statement goes with each of the contested races. As a matter of fact, due to several comments in one candidates speech and his opposition's innapropriate comment to two women after the speeches, one of the races will have a write in vote from me.

Jamison Tomasek

1:53 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Sadly the casual voter is a fact. They show up to vote (good) but don't get educated (bad). This is why the candidates with money (state or national) fill your airwaves and mailboxes with simple images either positive for them or negative for their opponent. There are numerous other voting tendencies (anti-incumbent, experience is better, party loyalty etc etc) that are associated with this.

Reply

Richard young

2:11 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

For many years dating back to the 1960's the League of Woman voters conducted the debates for town elections,obviously they are either not in the position to continue the tradition,now maybe a business group or fraternal group could sponsor a debate and use the format and ground rules that the League of Woman Voters used when they sponsored the debate, which was fair and impartial.CAndidates have a responsibility to participate in a fair and impartial debate

Reply

Leave a comment