Patrick Proposes Sin Taxes For State [POLL]
A tax on cigarettes, junk food, aim to raise money for state and make residents healthier.
Under a proposal by Gov. Deval Patrick, "sin taxes" on cigarettes will increase and new sales taxes on candy and soda will be put into place.
Patrick is proposing the increase as a way to raise $260 million in new revenues for the state budget, according to an Associated Press article on Wednesday.
Under the plan, the cigarette tax will be increased from $2.51 per pack to $3.01 per pack - an increase of 50 cents.
The plan will also ask to impose the state’s 6.25 percent sales tax on candy and soda — both items are currently exempt from the tax — and expand the state’s bottle deposit law to include bottled water, sports drinks and other beverages, the Associated Press reported.
The plan would also double the taxes paid on other tobacco products such as cigars and smokeless tobacco. The tobacco tax hike was expected to raise $73 million, officials told the Associated Press, with the money earmarked to help offset the cost of a recent decision by the state’s highest court that cleared the way for thousands of legal immigrants to join Commonwealth Care, the state’s subsidized health insurance program.
Along with boosting revenues, administration officials said higher taxes on tobacco and junk food might also help make people healthier.
Cool Fusion
12:25 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
If you find you’ve just written a sentence that begins with "Under a proposal by Gov. Deval Patrick" . . , just stop writing .. we already know what will follow. it's time to regift the statue of liberty since we have no more use for it.
Tom Gilroy
12:33 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
This state and the federal government benefit greatly from the taxes included in the price. Should the rate be increased sales will decrease as will state and federal tax revenues. If the taxes were decreased the opposite would result but Democrats do not decrease taxes.
Anna Bucciarelli
6:44 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Bologna! What planet do you live on?
Tyler Jozefowicz
4:15 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
the marginal response coefficients for miniscule tax assessments are insignificant and have no bearing on the decision to purchase especially addictive productslike cigarrettes. In fact if addicts buy less cigarettes I think that is a good thing. The old laffer curve theory was proven wrong a long,long time ago, but conservatives still persist.
malcolm nichols
7:37 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
When DeVal raised the State Sales tax our border towns simply purchased in New Hampshire,etc... Decreasing state revenue. When he increases Cig tax he is forcing smokers to purchase in New Hampshire...again reducing revenue.
In his mind if he increased Cig tax to say $1000 per pack we would really maximize profits. Perhap most people see increasing taxes at some point have a diminishing return. DeVal has passed it, and this is why business is leaving MA.
Mike Combs
11:53 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Our meals tax is only 2/3 that of NH. Have you noticed all our restaurant parking lots jammed full with NH plates? I haven't.
malcolm nichols
3:09 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Mike did you forget, Tewksbury added a special restaurant tax and hotel tax.
Think about it this way, If you charged $1000 per pack tax or $10,000 per pack tax how much more taxes would you collect annually. The answer is none because no one would by cigs in Ma.
Vincent DiRico
7:49 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
I am no fan of Cadillac Drivel Patrick. I buy everything I can in NH, it pains me to give in and shop at a local shop because I didn't plan well enough.
RH
9:04 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
I am not a fan of taxes but to look at it from the other side, how much does it cost tax payers every year to take care of people who smoke or get health issues due to consumption of junk food. We are becoming an overweight lazy society. We pretty much poison ourselves with unhealthy foods and then we make Phamacutical Companies rich buying medications to counteract our poor habits. We eat like crap make ourselves sick the then say give us Insulin, Lipitor ect. This drives healthcare costs and Medicare costs through the roof and we all pay for it. We spend nearly 17% of our GDP on healthcare. We spend more on healthcare than every other country in the world.
Bryan McGonigle2
9:47 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
RH
One way to look at your argument is that these behaviors add costs to society - which they do.
I view these behaviors as increasing the cost of government. If the government didn't provide as many services, most/more of the costs associated with these behaviors would be borne by the individuals "mis-behaving" and not the government. [Or if the costs are borne more by the individuals family, the family is more deputized to step in and fix the situation]. The taxpayers wouldn't be as resentful to those of us who are overweight and lazy. And more importantly, there would be fewer overweight and lazy people since the job wouldn't "pay" as much.
Best wishes,
Mike
Matt Hanson
2:06 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Mike,
If people are unhealthy and they have health insurance the cost get's spread to everyone anyways. What shared services that we all pay for with taxes are increased because of poor personal choices by some people? I am not being facetious, I am legitimately curious.
Thanks,
Matt
Bryan McGonigle2
2:58 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Any Government services we all pay for - Medicare, Medicaid, SSI, Social Security, Welfare, Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac/FDIC/FHFA, business tax breaks, Education, and ... is ripe for poor personal behavior to impose costs on all of us.
Since health insurance is often received through employers, it might not be the best example to demonstrate. But health insurance would be much cheaper if we all bought or didn't buy our own policies - like life insurance. I personally would want insurance for high cost items out of my control - but I wouldn't buy coverage for doctor's visits, low cost prescription drugs, ... if I had the chance. When I eat and drink too much, I would pay for the doctor's visits and not you.
I don't believe the recent housing bubble would have happened (or would be much less severe) if the government wasn't so involved in making housing more affordable. The bad behavior of home buyers, appraisers, mortgage brokers, Freddie/Fannie, ... made the rest of us pay more for homes and will raise our taxes to pay for the bailouts.
There are quite a few children in the Lawrence schools, IMHO, who aren't getting a very good education for various reasons - including poor behavior from "some" students, parents, teachers, administrators. This bad behavior increases the cost of education for all of us.
Matt Hanson
3:19 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Hi Mike,
Credit default swaps, deregulation, and fraud were the major perpetrators of the housing bubble. Normally fannie and freddie made it cheaper to borrow, yes that does help increase home values. Most people wanted that though. I understand your point though. The good thing about health insurance is that risk is spread, you cant just start paying insurance for medication when you start to get sick or the system won't work. Larger pools typically have lower costs. I think you are getting at an idea that it would be cheaper if people who ate and drank too much paid more for insurance which is true of course. That doesn't usually happen but I know I get $150 back for my gym membership every year. You mention the other services, medicare, social security, education etc are ripe for poor personal hebavior to impose costs on all of us. Do we do away with all of those services though or try to make them work and reduce costs? I wasn't sure which angle you were going with that...
~Matt
Bryan McGonigle2
3:31 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Matt,
In regards to - "I wasn't sure which angle you were going with that..." - you asked me to come up with examples and that's what I did.
Matt Hanson
3:34 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Okay, I understand, thanks.
Dan D.
9:32 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Government takes enough of our money already. No need for any new taxes.
Mike Combs
11:47 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
We just lowered corporate taxes, reducing revenues by 148 million. This is part of a multiyear plan which is reducing rates from 9% to 8%.
Deval's plan eliminates a special sales tax exemption on candy, increasing revenues by $61 million, and hikes the cigarette tax to gain another $73 million. Combined, they don't offset the reduced corporate tax.
Everyone wants their local aid, Chapter 70 school funding, roads, and affordable housing for seniors and vets. The question is who's going to pay for it? Candy-eating kids, smokers, or businesses?
Cool Fusion
3:30 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Truely Mike, if the Guv'na or yourself were really so concerned with those who may incur adverse health effects from the consumption of excess sugar or the ill-effects of tobacco .. he would have proposed that these taxes be collected and held in dedicated state Trust accounts that would escrow the collected amounts to be available to backstop any consequential issues. In truth, this is just another stealth attack by the Education/Industry complex to extract more gravy from already strapped citizens to continue to feed this greedy and self-serving mercenary cabal by pimping our children.
Vivian Merrill
12:20 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Mike and RH bring up good points-people do not like to be told what to do, and they do not want to be told how to spend their money. And no one has mentioned how many people who aren't finding jobs have had to depend on the state for welfare and health ins, housing, utilities, foodstamps, cell phones and similar programs. I heard there's even a program that will help them pay their car insurance. Someone's got to pay for it, and I'm frustrated with paying for it with 1/3 of my paycheck each week. Let the users pay a little for now. I choose not to smoke, eat a lot of candy or even subscribe to cable television. It's the only way I have left to maximize what's left of my income.
Dan
12:40 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Every time this guy opens his mouth, it's another TAX. How about cutting Your bennies???He can't go away enough, so we don't get taxed. I'm sure just like the last tax on cigg's the money will go to Enlighten the public not to smoke. This will stop everyone from eating candy and drinking soda...More money to line these idiots pockets, can you say Chelsea building association, or disabled collabrativemoney. Stop those kinds of thievery and save a buck there instead of working folks.
Matt Hanson
2:09 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
How much can we cut legitimately cut benefits and how much would that affect the state budget and taxation levels? Does anyone know of a link to any studies?
malcolm nichols
3:17 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
I think a TV watching tax would be great. Perhaps a meter could be applied to every TV and the owner would be responsible for, say $1/minute, as a stupidity assessment. If less people watched TV and exercised instead, then we would have a much healthier population and insurance would be less. Maybe we should also assess a health premium to TV watchers as they are going to over burden our communistic insurance system.
Tyler Jozefowicz
4:27 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
We're entering whacko land now. Seat belts on and chairs in the upright position.
Dan O'Neill
8:02 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
A brief course correction from whacko land....insurance companies have been driving up health costs & premiums for years...they spend huge dollars with lobbyists in washington....hospitals, healthcare providers & us premium payers have been held hostage by them for years.....taxes on gasoline are supposed to maintain our roads & bridges.....profits from the Mass lottery are supposed to be divided to help cities & towns....payroll social security taxes were supposed to be escrowed to pay the future retirement benefits of those workers....unfortunately those funds were raided to pay for other things in washington & balance their budgets....greed, derivatives and insuring those derivatives is the reason for too big to fail, tarp & the housing bubble burst....but to be "PC" let's blame all of those bad people who smoke, drink, don't eat what you think is healthy, watch too much TV, play too many video games, "misbehaving" people & students????? ARE YOU SERIOUS?????
Laura Kernan
9:11 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Cigarettes are a different issue, but the reason why food is not taxed in MA is because it is considered a necessity. Taxing food would be regressive since the poor have less money to spend on necessities. (not that we don't have some regressive taxes). But are candy and soda necessities? With all the processing, are they even really food?
Cool Fusion
9:24 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
If a tax on food is a grievous "Regressive" tax, then why did this town just pass a meals tax which targets the poor, working contractors, and striving families who are the primary users of food vendors? File this dubious vote under the tab: "Be careful for what you wish for.. because you might get it".
Andrew Sylvia
9:41 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Actually, food, if purchased in a retail setting, is taxed under MGL 64H. However, there is one exception to this rule.... (http://westford.patch.com/articles/massachusetts-infinite-sales-tax-holiday)
Laura Kernan
9:33 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Because eating at a restaurant is not considered a necessity by the state.
Dan
10:08 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
Prepared food at your gocery store is Taxed in Mass...Next the toy in the Happy Meal!!!Saw an interesting rant by a reader from Mass this AM..You make the money they Tax it,you save the money they Tax it,you spend the money they Tax it,Tax it a second time when you buy gas,Tax it agian when you buy a car, Sales, Excise. People are Struggling Bigtime now and all these people can think of is Another Tax!!!How's that gas tax money working out on your roads??? Getting better??Lot of smoking stopped since the last tax on it???
Vivian Merrill
11:45 am on Friday, January 27, 2012
intereting point, Dan-we can make choices to avoid some taxes, but its almost impossible to avoid them all. I quit smoking when cigs went to $2.50/pack. They are now over $8./pack, and people are slowing down, but not in significant enough numbers to make a differnce. Some people gave up their cars when they got too expensive. Others get their internet at a public place, such as the library. or now wireless phones make it pretty easy to get. Others shop in NH. Others still get as much as they can from yard sales. Others still give up and go on welfare. It's all in how creative you want to be.
Dan
1:02 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
I can get just as creative as the next person, but we are losing alot. Keep the lights off as much as possibe,heat turned down, don't drive as much fine, but I don't see anyone at the top doing anything like that!!!You think John Kerry can relate to the working people in this state?? How about eEizebeth Warren and her 600K salery a year from Harvard, think she can relate??? Why is it always the people who pay the bills and do right that get hit over the head??? Sex offenders on every street, but I have to pull my kids inside and change my lifestyle for them???What happens when people stop smoking, or drinking, where will the tax money come from then??? Potato chips next???Butter, white bread?? I never said we don't need taxes, but the money these pol's get Never put it to what it is supposed to go to. You want to live like Ted Kazinsky fine, but I would like a little bit of pleasure in my life without being fleeced by the have's evertime I turn around!!!
Vivian Merrill
1:24 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
me too, Dan. So how are we going to do it? This stuff has been happening for hundreds, maybe thousands, of years. Do we stage a protest? No one takes those seriously anymore-look what happened with the Occupy movements and Tea Party. We tried going to war, that hasn't helped the economy, and a lot of people got hurt. Most of our factories got turned into housing (not affordable housing, just housing). The farmers are starting to fight back, but it ain't been easy with companies like Monsanto calling the shots, because we have to feed all those people.
So, how do we take our lives back? Ask any (rich) politician, he'll tell you he's worked damn hard for his money, and the rest of us should be more supportive of those less fortunate than us, because of all those programs....where was that money supposed to go? It's a vicious circle...
Dan
3:38 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
Don't know Vivian...Your right as far as getting people together to support a cause. Check out the town meetings...Just because it happens doesn't mean you can't use a forum to get it off your chest!!!Most people in this state just sit back and take it, and wonder why nothing changes. Moan and groan but do nothing about it..I try atleast by writing in to the paper Lowell Sun, or this application. I call my Rep and Senator, and show up to vent at thier meetings. Mr Miceli and Mr Finegold are atleast receptive and listen and seem to try and get things done, but other than sticking my head out the window and shouting I'm Mad as Hell and Not going to take it anymore, I'm just as mystified as you are. I would have thought after the last election things were going to change and people were fed up, but the same old same old got in, and here we are talking about taxes again...You would think it would reach a point when people would have enough, but not there yet I guess. Don't see it getting any better soon.
mike t
11:54 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
It's funny how people complain about Deval's proposals when the people voted to keep him in office. Massachusetts you've made your bed now lie in it!
Joe Veno
2:51 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
mike t. Lets get one thing straight, Not ALL the people in Mass voted for him !!!
Tom Maggiacomo
12:39 am on Sunday, January 29, 2012
Bob, I hope you're joking!