patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Poll: Massachusetts Voters Say No to Cuts in Fiscal Cliff Talks

Instead, those polled say, increase taxes on the rich and end corporate subsidies.

 

As Congress wrestles with how to avoid the imminent fiscal cliff, a poll finds that Massachusetts voters strongly favor increased taxes on the rich, less corporate welfare and no cuts in social security, Medicare or Medicaid.

"I think that this survey really gives us a clear view of voters expectations of their elected officials," said Jason Stephany of MassUniting, a sel-described coalition of "community groups, neighborhoods, faith organizations and workers advocating for good jobs, corporate accountability."

MassUniting conducted the poll along with Public Policy Polling. It was conducted from Nov. 27-29 and included 638 Massachusetts voters. 

"Essentially, the big thing that this poll tells us is that this election was not a fluke or a one-off thing," Jim Williams of Public Policy Polling said.

The top priorities for Massachusetts voters continue to be "job creation, deficit reduction and affordable health care," he added.

Massachuset communities are facing some challenging fiscal times in the coming months. Gov. Deval Patrick recently announced actual state revenues were significantly lower than projections, resulting in a $540 million budget shortfall for Fiscal Year 2013.

As a result, the governor announced he will be implementing $225 million in immediate budget cuts, some of which may impact Tewksbury.

He has also asked the Legislature to expand his authority, allowing him to make an immediate, across the board, one percent cut in state aid for FY13. In the case of Tewksbury, which has been slated to receive roughly $15.5 million in education and municipal aid this year, it would mean the loss of approximately $150,000.

MassUniting claims that by strong margins, their poll shows voters support raising revenue rather than cutting services. When asked whether those making more than $250,000 should pay more in taxes, 61 percent said yes.

When asked if Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid should be cut, 73 percent said no. Upward of 77 percent support eliminating oil subsidies and corporate tax loopholes, and 76 percent said Congress should pass meaningful legislation to support job creation. 

And if Congress doesn't reach an agreement, a plurality of Bay State voters—42 percent—would blame Republicans. But Democrats wouldn't entire escape blame; 28 percent would blame the Dems and 27 percent of those polled said both parties would be equally to blame.

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.

Related Topics: Healthcare, Social Security, fiscal cliff, and public opinion poll

Bob

1:27 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

It also shows the dumbing down of society is well under way!
Let's tax them at 100% and keep the bloated government open for 8 more days! Then what?

Reply

salemst

2:08 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

We have to have the dumbest citizens in the country.
Raising taxes into a Depressionesque economy shows the vast number of people here have zero clue how the private sector works. Can they all be working for the government?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

2:11 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

But their number one priority is "job creation". Go figure!

Bruce Panilaitis

3:18 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

We have one of the most educated populations in the country, and this poll bears that out.

Reply

Who Me?

3:45 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Nothing more than a left wing faction of SEIU and hardly a poll of any factual relevance. It should have been pointed out as so.

http://blog.thephoenix.com/BLOGS/talkingpolitics/archive/2011/08/22/mass-uniting-s-super-secret-origins.aspx

Reply

Bill. S

6:27 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

The company that I work for (just over 200 employees) currently has 3-4 decent paying openings, yet they WILL NOT HIRE!! They have told us that they are concerned about the fiscal cliff looming and the taxes that the business expects to incur. They have decided (for now) to get by with who they have. 3-4, 40k - 60k+ jobs will go unfilled. Thats good job creation. Go Obama Go. I also heard that they (owners) plan to drop our health care benefit once O care is fully implemented. Seems like they would rather pay a $200 per employee "tax" instead of paying the current cost of $6000 per employee for health insurance. Go figure. BTW $6000 is half the cost of our health care. We pay the other $6000. which is a far better deal than O care will be for my family and I.

Reply

Bill. S

6:28 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

$2000 per employee tax (sorry)

Reply

Leave a comment