Tewksbury Man Arrested in Sudbury on Felony Warrant
Man familiar to Tewksbury Police is arrested again in Sudbury.
A Tewksbury man who had two warrants our for his arrest was taken into custody by the Sudbury Police Department earlier on Thursday.
According to Lt. Scott Nix, the department received information from another police station that Robert Gorski, 20, of 140 Vernon St., was wanted for questioning regarding another crime.
According to Tewksbury Police, Gorski has a lengthy criminal record as an adult, mostly for drug and larceny related offenses.
Sudbury officers were dispatched to 655 Boston Post Road, Apt. 1111, to look for Gorski, who had two outstanding warrants for his arrest.
"(Upon) arriving at the apartment, officers could hear music playing, and then (it) was turned off," Nix said in a press release. "But the occupants refused to answer to our continued attempts for them to answer the door."
As officers continued to monitor the apartment, a person matching the description of Gorski peered out a window at officers, but still refused to answer the door. Officers then obtained a search warrant from Framingham District Court to enter the apartment.
Once inside, officers located Gorski and took him into custody without incident on the two warrants — one a felony and one a misdemeanor — out of Woburn District Court related to charges from Wilmington for larceny less than $250 and larceny more than $250. Both are default warrants.
"It remains under investigation whether the female lessee will be charged," Nix said in the release.
Gorski was booked and transported to Framingham District Court for arraignment.
No other information was available.
In January, Gorski was arrested in Sudbury on a warrant from Tewksbury for charges of:
- Breaking and entering of a building in the night time for a felony
- Receiving stolen property
- Destruction of property
- Conspiracy.
Tewksbury Patch Editor Bill Gilman contributed to this article.
Mary
8:18 am on Friday, March 9, 2012
You have to be kidding!! This guy is not in jail and out wandering the streets again. When is justice going to be served; lock him up and throw away the key. Obviously he will never learn and will be a full time criminal.
Dan
11:29 am on Friday, March 9, 2012
From the look on his face, he could be a politician!!! How come he wasn't picked up after the first warrent??? I'm sure he's out again, and will be picked up again, after his next warrent!!!Even a lengthy criminal doesn't mean much in this state, along with the 9 time drunk drivers still out there. Keeping the people safe not number one on the legislatures docket I'm guessing!!!!
Joe Bill
4:44 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012
This makes me sick because he's not going to do any significant time until he kills someone, which he eventually will. "A lengthy criminal record as an adult." Are you kidding he's been an adult 2 years and he setting records...just wait until he's in his 30's.
Mary
5:35 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012
The girl that he lives with in Sudbury should be punished for harboring a fugitive!
illegal alien
9:27 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012
this clown is going far in life...nice picture...LOL
Jake P
8:09 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012
Joe Bill Bill Gilman should strike you from the site. Thats a terrible statement. He should be locked up I agree but there but for the grace of God could be me or you. He is somebodys' son with serious issues.
David R.
12:59 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012
Joe Bill, I agree 100%.
Jake P, you are part of the problem and reason that all these losers keep getting out. You think that everyone deserves another chance again and again and again. This guy will never straighten up. He's someone son alright: the son of a couple of losers.
Melissa Gleaton
3:02 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012
wow, we're wishing people death now? NOT wishing death on someone doesn't mean that the guy should get off... Wish for change in the justice system. Vote for change in the system. Don't wish death on people. Jeeze.
Mary
10:44 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012
Melissa, is there any bill out there now that we can vote on for change in the system? I would like to know about it, and I would be the first to vote for this change. Someone who habitually commits crimes should not be out walking the streets, time and time again. What is the perpetrator learning if they know that they will once more be free again.