patching...
Update: Get Tewksbury's latest headlines in your inbox each morning—sign up for our daily newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Tewksbury To Save $745K Under New Insurance Deal

Montuori negotiates four-year agreement with municipal unions.

 

The Town and the School District will share in a $745,000 savings in the first year of a new insurance agreement with the municipal unions.

Town Manager Richard Montuori negotiated the four-year deal with a committee representing all of the town's unions. It takes effect July 1.

The town will continue to pay 75 percent of employees' premium for health insurance (Blue Cross/Blue Shield), 80 percent of the premium for dental insurance and 50 percent of the premium for life insurance. However, there are several changes in the new agreement that contribute to the savings.

  • Employees working 20 hours a week or more are eligible for coverage, up from 17.4 hours a week.
  • Elected town officials working less than 20 hours a week for the town are no longer included with the unions in the agreement. And after a vote of the Board of Selectmen last week, they are no longer eligible for coverage. This will remove eight people from the plan.
  • Employees will continue to have the option of being part of an HMO plan or a PPO plan but the conditions of those plans have been changed to lower the premiums.
  • The town will start to provide OBRA extended benefits for Medex recipients with the town covering 90 percent of the premium and the retiree 10 percent.

According to Montuori, current employees have the choice of joining the old HMO, the new HMO or the new PPO. New employees will choose between the new HMO and the new PPO. He said the new plans mirror what the state offers its employees.

Retired employees will be allowed to remain in their PPO, which allows patients to see "out of plan" doctors and doesn't require referrals from primary care physicians.

Montuori said that while there are other towns that allow elected officials to participate in the municipal insurance program, it is unusual to have them included in the insurance agreement with the unions.

"I have no idea why they were in there but they were. Now, they've been removed," he said.

The changes to the insurance plans being made in Tewksbury and many other communities in the Commonwealth, were made possible through a bill passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Patrick, giving municipalities more flexibility in how they provide insurance.

One provision under the law, explained Montuori, is that the towns must share at least 25 percent of the costs savings from the first year with the employees. This can come either through lower premiums or by creating a mitigation fund to help employees with uncovered expenses.

Montuori said Tewksbury will set up a mitigation fund with 15 percent of the savings (roughly $111,750) in the first year of the agreement and another 15 percent in the third year of the agreement. If there is anything left from that fund after the fourth year, it will be used to reduce premiums, said Montuori.

According to Montuori, there are presently 710 active municipal employees plus another 499 MedEx recipients (retirees) on the town health insurance plan. There are 1,071 on the town dental plan.

 

Related Topics: Health Insurance, Life Insurance, Richard Montuori, and Town Manager

Bill. S

8:29 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

its a start. 75% is still too much though. My company of 200 emplyees pays only 50%.
If we dont like it, they say we can leave whenever we want. I would like to see that stand taken with unions who know that towns have no money

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gordon Pickguard

8:51 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Right on Bill ! 50% is pretty standard in the private sector. Why should the taxpayers subsidize a better deal for the public employee ? I challenge anyone to justify this.

Comment_arrow

debbie

11:35 am on Friday, May 4, 2012

I agree Bill, it's a start but hopefully not the end. If any company can afford 75% that is fantastic but it is definitely not the norm. Most companies in the private sector also do not provide 90% of the Cobra premium. I was laid off in January of this year and am eligible for Cobra if I elected. I had to pay 100% of the premium and deducting that from unemployment just doesn't make sense. The perks the employees are receiving are still well above the private sector. You have to learn to live with adjustments and with today's economy the town employees need to also learn to live with it. We all seem to manage. Unfortunately we become complacent and think that we can't handle the change. It doesn't make them bad people just unfamiliar to change. Hopefully Montuori will continue to look into more savings for the tax payers.

malcolm nichols

8:36 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

How are we dealing with pensions and the long term liabilities? Are we fully funded or are we going to default?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gordon Pickguard

10:17 am on Thursday, May 3, 2012

Unless economic conditions improve so dramatically allowing taxpayers to support this runaway municipal spending, the answer is YES we will default. We're heading at a steady speed towards the edge of cliff but no seems to want to do anything abour it.

Jon Pratt

10:31 am on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

health ins 12M tap present and retirees
of the 745K -222k(mitigation fund) = 523K one time savings which includes 100K savings by kicking elected officials off the plan.
The unions aren't fighting this because GIC plan is a tiered plan with higher copays and deductables but with less premium which would favor the town also.

Reply

Dan

1:31 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

I agree with Bill...It's a start....Saw the new teachers contract and while I appreciate them going along with no raise again, doesn't 15 sick days seem kind of high??? Also these buy backs of sick day's is pretty much a Lost art in the private sector, just hasn't seemed to get to state works yet!!!

Reply

city guy

9:20 pm on Wednesday, May 2, 2012

And when the unions get 50% you private sectors will get 20%

Reply

malcolm nichols

7:54 am on Thursday, May 3, 2012

You need to remember that we are talking about benefits and perks. They are incentives to convince employees to accept an possition.
They however, are only perks and Not entitlments or guarantees.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

1:07 pm on Thursday, May 3, 2012

I understand but in the dreaded private sector, I as a manager can't put my company in financial peril because I need to fill a position. These perks are from 40-50 years ago when the average public worker was making 50-75% of the private sector. The thought was that they would get better pensions at the end while forfeiting pay up front. Today the average public sector worker makes 10-30% more and makes better pensions so the system has tipped and our elected officials don't have the will to fix it. We the lemmings keep electing the same spineless politicians then complain when they don't do their job!

Jon Pratt

8:11 am on Thursday, May 3, 2012

Don't forget 2% raise of 45m salaries 900k * 3 yrs= 2.7m
and health still goes up 5-8% a year
unions got a good deal more not less is always good
avg taxpayer works 224 days to pay for gov.

Reply

Leave a comment