patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

To Vaccinate or not Vaccinate Your Children

Vaccinations have come under scrutiny in recent years; How does the Moms Council feel about the practice.

 

The Tewksbury Patch Moms Council is made of moms throughout the community from all different walks of life. Each week, the moms tackle a different question posed by readers of Tewksbury Patch on issues of life, family and motherhood. This week's topic is about deals with vaccinations. Do they do more harm than good? Are they worthwhile?

Dear Moms Council,

A columnist on Patch wrote on Sunday about a bad reaction her son had from a vaccination. Some people have said that vaccinations are connected to causing autism. But other people say vaccinations are really important for your children. What do you think?

Linda Rowe -- I chose to have both my children vaccinated...that was 20 years ago.  I would be very upset with myself if I didnt allow my children to get the necessary vaccinations and years later they were to get a communicable disease that could have been prevented.  As with any medication, there are risks.  At the pediatrician's office there is literature on each vaccination...read about it and make the decision that is best for your family.

Lisa Spinelli-White -- Vaccinations do not cause autism, IMO. A simple look into the stats show that boys are three to four times more likely than girls (according to NIH) to have autism, and this can not be accounted for if blaming vaccines and/or the preservatives in vaccines like squalene (which is sometimes blamed for a number of other adverse reactions).

I believe that
a) people are more aware about autism now and tests are done much more frequently than they were in the past so more children are found to have it
b) it could be that it is becoming over-diagnosed in some cases (though I do believe it does exist and early detection helps immensely when dealing with this condition).
c) People want to blame something other than genetics when it's their children's lives at stake (because many parents feel responsible if it is their genetic code that caused a condition like autism even though they shouldn't--much easier said than done). I believe it is at least partially genetic in most cases (I'm not a doctor so I'm sure there are some environmental reasons it's happened at least once or twice) and there is nothing to blame but mother nature.
d) New studies have shown that the timing of children (older mothers and having children less than 2 years apart) increases the risk of having a child with autism. With the families I know who have autistic children, about half of the autistic children were born less than 2 years apart from their older siblings. I have not seen the older-mother cause in the families I know, however.

These are simply my observations and what I know from studies published in the media, I am not a doctor. I hope I have not offended anyone, that is not my intention, and I wish to express my whole-hearted empathy for those dealing with this condition. As a mother I can only imagine what it would be like to deal with this and my love and support go out to all the families who are.

Maureen Castiglione -- In my opinion, the risks of non-vaccination far outweigh the risks of vaccination.  Period.   While the original study linking vaccinations to autism has been discredited, including by the original Medical Journal (The Lancet) that published it back in 1988, the damage has been done.  There are people who will never vaccinate their children because they are afraid, and that's too bad.  As the recent outbreak of measles in Boston, and other preventable diseases around the country in recent years have shown, the decision to vaccinate or not effects more than just one person or family.

Lisa Broderick -- I also am in the camp of feeling like it's worse to not vaccinate your child.  I did my research before I had my first child, and while I will admit the research out there did worry me about mercury in vaccines and the autism link at the time, but I also felt strongly pro-vaccine, as did my pediatrician.  So, I did have both my children vaccinated on schedule.  I do know, as other posters have mentioned, that the link of autism from vaccines has now been disputed, so again- yes, I am glad I vaccinated and honestly can't imagine the whole different type of fear (life threatening diseases) I would feel if I had not...

Kendra McCauley -- I believe the good outweighs the bad with vaccinations. Just look at what is going on now in the Boston area with the Measles outbreak. I have 4 sons and haven't had any complications with any shots given.

Sue Panilaitis -- Wow - you opened a can of worms here at home!  As a wife of an immunologist at Tufts, you set off a lively discussion at home.  As a result of a subject very close to home and one that riles the two of us up, I have not been able to keep to the 100 word max.  We need to educate people regarding the newest research out there rather than perpetuating misinformation. 

These are my thoughts:

Just recently, as the result of 18 studies examining the link between autism and vaccinations (in effort to refute the one “study” of eight cases that originated this argument), it was proven that there is no link between autism and vaccinations

The whole argument began in 1998 with one British doctor who wrote an article suggesting that the MMR vaccination caused autism.  Since then, Andrew Wakefield has had his medical license removed based on his dishonesty and irresponsibility when conducting his research.  Unfortunately, the damage of one misinformed person resulted in outbreaks of deadly, painful diseases that could have been prevented. 

Just in 2008, an unvaccinated child traveled overseas and contracted measles.  As a result, there was the largest outbreak of measles in over a decade in San Diego. Why?  Because people have opted out of vaccinating their children.

Fortunately in this day and age, it is more common for families to know of others that have suffered side effects while not knowing of a particular case that the vaccination is preventing in the first place.  Due to this bent, it is easier to try to avoid something that seems more likely than the original issue.  As a result of vaccinations, we do not have personal experiences of pneumonia and encephalitis (swelling of the brain) associated with a measles infection.

I have 6 children.  We have dealt with side effects of vaccinations, some more serious than others, but would never consider not having our children vaccinated.  I would rather deal with the side effects – which can be traumatic – than have my child suffer greatly and perhaps die by a disease that could have been prevented. 

Remember, the more people who do not vaccinate, the more likely an outbreak.

If you want to read more about how there is no link between vaccinations and autism, information regarding this subject can be gleaned from websites such as AAP (American Pediatrics Association), CDC (Center for Disease Control), Autism Science Foundation, and Every Child By two. 

About this column: "Moms Talk Q & A" is a place for parents to drop-in and discuss a different topic weekly.
What do you think? Do you agree that the value of vaccinations outweighs any possible risk? Tell us in the comments.

L Parker

7:23 pm on Wednesday, March 16, 2011

The CDC now recommends 32 shots (15 or more virus') before baby is 24 months of age. Every time a person gets a shot, s/he sheds the virus through mucus and fecal matter for weeks to months, putting others at-risk for the disease and other sequelae (i.e. shingles). Autism aside, 1 in 4 children now has an autoimmune diagnosis, 1 in 6 has a learning disability, and childhood cancer has exploded. I wouldn't drink a glass of water with the vaccine and excipients in it, why would I let someone inject it into my child whose brain and other critical organs are developing! If vaccines were safe, there would be no need to provide blanket immunity from liability to vaccine manufacturers!!! Honestly, we'll risk the disease and pass on lifelong illness.

Reply

T. Studies

1:20 pm on Thursday, March 17, 2011

A lot of this information is common misconception. Check out my blog about vaccines with videos, stats, and comments from physicians. http://taketimetofindyourtruth.blogspot.com/

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Bill Gilman

3:19 pm on Thursday, March 17, 2011

Bruce, I'm going to respectfully disagree with you on this. I understand the passion of your position. Having done many stories on this subject over the years, I can tell you that those opposed to vaccination and are personally involved either as parents or medical professionals believe as strongly in their position as you do in yours. Moreover, I take my responsibility seriously. This is not a whimsical debate. Lives are at stake one way or another. My goal here is to initiate a healthy, educational discussion of the issue. Your input in this debate as a professional in the field is most welcomed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce Panilaitis

4:57 pm on Thursday, March 17, 2011

My issue is simply that this was put out as a debate of opinion, where the overwhelming evidence in the peer-reviewed medical and research literature indicates that the vaccines currently part of the standard regiment in the US are safe. It was presented without that context. Because each side has equal passion does not mean that they have equal truth. The evidence is unequivocal, and as the recent vaccination-autism link as fraud demonstrates, an uneducated public can easily be swayed by anecdotal instances. No matter how terrifying those instances are, they do not demonstrate causal relationships, and do not demonstrate the kind of medical certainty that is being portrayed. In my opinion, it is up to journalists not to simply present the two sides of an argument, but what the accepted facts are in the field. As a scientist, I am ready to change my position when presented with evidence, that's the core of being a research scientist, but a passionate opinion doesn't equal evidence.
I enjoy reading Patch, and think that you do a wonderful job covering the local issues, better than anyone else out there. However, I would argue that the debate about vaccine safety belongs in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, or one of the other peer-reviewed medical journals out there.

Salon1475

5:56 pm on Thursday, March 17, 2011

All of my children have received all their vaccinations and I have no problem with them getting them. However, my oldest did have a reaction to the MMR vaccine and with the help of my doctors we decided it best for her not to get the booster shot due to her reaction the first time. This in no way has affected my husband or myself in making decisions regarding the rest of our children. The benefits of being vaccinated outweighs the sometimes unfortunate reactions.

Reply

L Parker

12:33 am on Sunday, March 20, 2011

The benefits of being vaccinated outweighs the sometimes unfortunate reactions." One might consider that families of those who suffer the "sometimes unfortunate reactions," like death, permanent brain damage, and life-long severe disability may disagree with your statement. Regardless of whether this happens 1 in a million or one in four; that "1" is a person who lost their potential for a healthy and full life. As for the value of vaccination - I have 3 children, it was my fully vaccinated child who got the worst case of Chicken Pox (from a recently vaccinated classmate), the worst case of the Measles (again, courtesy of a recently vaccinated classmate), and is suffering with lifelong, permanent brain damage as a result of her four-month vaccinations. Strangely, the Chicken Pox, Measles, and Mumps did no permanent harm to my children - but now they have the benefit of life-long immunity with no need for boosters. Hmmm, vaccinate (32 shots in the first 2 years, then "boosters" nearly yearly) and risk both the possibility of adverse events AND STILL contracting the disease and the risks attendant with the disease, or let Nature do her job and risk contracting the disease and attendant risks and receiving life-long immunity...

Reply

Sarah

3:18 am on Sunday, March 20, 2011

I see a lot of sides to all this. I believe a lot of people could survive not getting them just fine. However I don't really think a ton of people should stop vaccinating. Illnesses evolve. The more people who get sick the bigger the risk we're going to encounter some monster super bug. The idea behind vaccination isn't solely based on the individual. You vaccinate an entire population you are protecting the large majority... from each other. You better be extra careful with your germs if you're not vaccinated and you catch something. The person you give it to because you think you're well before you've stopped being infectious could be killed by it. I mean it's not any more fair if a kid dies from a vaccination reaction than because they die because a kid in class wasn't vaccinated and they're immuno-compromised when it's passed to them.

My two most intense thoughts over the whole thing are 1. Educate yourselves with some hard core science. I mean deep research. Find peer reviewed studies, look into who wrote it, look into the sources they cite if you don't trust it in itself. Learn to do research. Don't just look up a news article or blog. Sometimes studies are biased, but blogs and news articles ALWAYS are! 2. Attributing all sorts of illnesses solely to vaccines is a load of crap. Those same things have been attributed to pollution, the sun, family history, whatever someone can think of, often without basis. It's just fear mongering if you don't provide reliable proof.

Reply

Leave a comment