Dear Residents of Tewksbury,
We are writing this letter to inform you of the status of the Tewksbury Fire Department, specifically with regards to the South Street fire station. Back in the summer of 2008, the fire chief reluctantly agreed to a temporary closure of the station in order to help the town balance its books. Most cities and towns were hurting financially and Tewksbury was no exception. That same strategy was used again the following summer. But as the town regained a financially-stable footing, the closing of the south station continued.
What began as a one-time, two-month closure is now entering its 6th year with no end in sight. The duration of closure has steadily grown to over 6 months out of the year and may quite possibly be on its way to complete elimination. The only lapse in this ongoing decline in fire and emergency medical services was the successful effort of a group of concerned citizens at the 2012 annual town meeting. Money that the town manager cut from the fire department budget was restored for one fiscal year. But ignoring the spirit of that town meeting, the town manager is again under-funding the fire department for the FY14 budget which will undoubtedly result in the south station closing for 6 months, give or take.
In the discussion at that town meeting in 2012, it was explained by the town manager that there was not enough money for both a fully-funded fire department and a street sweeper. Rather than allocate the money towards the sweeper, those in attendance voted against the wishes of the town manager, selectmen, and the finance committee, and restored the funding to the fire department in order to keep the South Street fire station open. When the new sweeper was funded later that year, it reaffirmed our belief that keeping all fire stations open is not a matter of finances, it’s a matter of priorities.
Opening the South Street fire station by bringing the fire department back to full staffing would mean restoring about $350,000 to its budget. The town manager has made it very clear that he has no intention of using money from the stabilization account to stabilize the fire department. Ironically enough, the stabilization account has been funded in no small part by large cuts to the fire department over the last 5 years.
There has been talk of hiring additional firefighters to cut down on overtime when other firefighters are on vacation. But study after study has shown that paying overtime is the more cost-effective way in the long run to provide coverage for the fire department. Either way the town chooses to go, we are after one thing and one thing only and that is a year-round, fully-staffed fire department to meet the current needs of this community.
We have prided ourselves on stepping up many times to help the town manager, past and present, deal with financial difficulties going back as far as the recession of the early 1990’s. The fire captains tried their best nearly a year-and-a-half ago in discussions with the chief and town manager to restore the needed protection to the residents of this community. We’ve grudgingly come to the conclusion that fire and medical safety is low on the town manager’s priority list and that we as firefighters can do little to nothing to restore the funding to reopen the station fulltime for FY14 and beyond.
We feel that It’s now time for you, the taxpayer, to get involved. There are several things that you can do if you would like to see the South Street fire station remain opened. You could write, call, or visit your selectman, town manager, fire chief, or finance committee member and let him/her know your feelings on this issue. A better option would be to attend the annual town meeting in May and exercise your right to vote. Our fear is that if nothing is done soon, we may be witnessing the final phases of South Street fire station.
Whatever direction the fire department heads, and no matter how many fire stations we have closed, the firefighters of this town will do their very best to answer each and every call in a timely and professional manner.
Thank you for your support and we look forward to seeing you at town meeting,
Sincerely,
Members of the Tewksbury Firefighters’
Local 1647, IAFF

jo
6:02 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
To me it should be a priority to maintain a fire station in the most densely populated part of town on a full-time basis. I also understand that the townspeople would not support an override. This makes for a difficult situation. I would have to think that the town manager is reluctantly making this recommendation. What other options are there?
Michael Adams
7:36 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
The town will get the degree of public safety they want to pay for. It's been said public safety is like an insurance policy, you pay for it reluctantly and hope you never need it, but if you do....your glad you paid your premiums. I'm no expert, but 3 manned fire stations is a must for a town of this size, ask an expert, not an accountant.
RD
8:14 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Override? Who said anything about an override when we're sitting on over $4,000,000? Get real jo
john smith
8:17 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
I understand closing a fire station if there isn't money available, but if funds are there, no matter where they come from, it is reckless not to use it for public safety. It is possible to explain to the resident who lost their house or loved one due to a lack of resources why it happened if the money was not there, but now it is there so there is no excuse. I would think the town manager and selectmen would see that and not want that kind of liability. If my house burns or my father dies of a heart attack and that station is closed with money to keep it open, watch out Mr. Montouri, Sokolove Law will be in touch. This town has exploded in recent years especially with all the senior housing. I have lived in this town for 36 years and know first hand that the fire department is stretched thinner than ever with an ever growing demand. I don't support an override, we don't need one, fund the fire department properly with the money available. I urge my neighbors to get active now because I also fear this town manager does not prioritize public safety. My family has utilized the Tewskbury fire department several times over the years and I have nothing but positive things to say. Listen to the people and ask them what they think is important. I think it would be overwhelmingly in support of a fully staffed fire department.
jim
9:00 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
Welcome to the real world unions........take pay cuts across the board, allow them to earn additional income through private company details to supplement their cuts. How many firefighters does 350,000 hire....? Go volunteer with full benefits and you will see people lined up to take and pass ff test.
jburke
9:48 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
I agree with Jim. Unions need a dose of reality here. There needs to come a point and time where they need to be subject to the harsh realities the private sector deals with. Many NH towns make do with volunteer fire departments.
TEE
10:45 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
What does volunteer with full benefits mean? This letter has nothing to do with the union taking a pay cut or dose of reality, the point is to let the residents of South Tewksbury know they will not be getting the same level of service for the taxes they pay, delayed response times for hands on a patient or water on a fire.
Jake P
6:55 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
I don't understand how our neighboring town Wilmington gets along fine with one fire station but Tewksbury needs three? How does Wilmington do it? Are people dying in that town because of the one station? Could the writer of this letter please explain the difference between the two towns. Thankyou
brigara
11:05 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
I would not be in support of a volunteer fire department. Being a fire fighter is more than just taking a class and passing a test. These are professionals and replacing them with volunteers is an outrageous suggestion. How many volunteers would willingly suit up and respond to a hazmat call? When things like this happen I want trained paid and committed professionals to serve our community.
So Tewks Res
11:14 am on Friday, February 15, 2013
Having three stations in a town the size of Tewksbury cuts down the response time by minutes, when someone is having a medical emergency or their home is on fire, this can be the difference between life and death, also can you tell me why the Wilmington Fire Depts, fully funded, budget is hundreds of thousands dollars more than Tewksburys? The difference between the towns is geographically Tewksbury is larger and has roughly seven thousand more residence. On another note if the south station is closed do we residents get a tax credit? We're paying for it whether its open or closed.
Vince
12:12 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
There is a new fire house on the Malden and Revere city line.
The Malden and Revere fire depts. share the same building.
Why couldn`t Tewksbury and Wilmington share the building on South st.?
john smith
12:26 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
What would that solve? Wilmington does not need our south station Tewksbury does. I have seen that fire station and it is two separate buildings attached like a condo. One half says Malden fire and the other says Revere fire. It is directly on the city line. Our south station is not designed that way as far as i know and it is well into Tewksbury, not on the town line. I don't think we need any ideas to get it done because the town has the money to fully fund the fire department but apparently has chosen not to. That to me seems to be the issue. Are the residents willing to accept another station closure needlessly or, like me, do they feel it should be a priority no matter what. According to this letter I am personally convinced that it should be open permanently by now.
David A.
12:23 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I'm disppointed to see a public union play on the fears of the community to further their collective barganing position. Overtime is not the way to fund a Fire station and the union know this.
There are ways to address this without bleeding the public dry in overrides or draining our rainy day fund (which by the way protects us from sudden drops in Stati aid which are coming!), or especially putting any of our good firefighters in a bad safety position. Its called two way negotiations. If the Police can do so can Fire...
john smith
12:35 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I don't think the truth is playing on fear. Police and fire are apples and oranges. No two work environments are the same. What works for one type of organization is not a blueprint. David do you have an answer on how to maintain fireighter numbers to keep the station open without overtime? The fire dept is not like most work places where if someone is out business as usual can go on. According to this letter the budget for the fire dept is 350 thousand short of year round coverage for the town. if the town has 4 million as one writer stated, it would not be drained. Relatively small amount of money to solve a huge problem.
David A.
4:46 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
You've missed my point John. The Police have added staff to reduce OT expenses and increase safety. Why can't the Fire dept? I want our Firefighters to be safe and I want the Station Open to keep my family safe. Why is the only option on the table robbing an overtime budget funded from money we can't count on being there year over year.
john smith
4:58 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
David I agree that more members of the fire dept would probably work. That has a price tag that the town apparently is unwilling to spend. It seems simple to me either hire more firefighters to fill the vacancies or pay overtime when a firefighter is out. I am willing to bet that overtime has always been the less expensive option becuase it does not come with long term costs like benefits. Either way it is time for the town to make this a priority and fund this dept properly. 3 stations does not seem excessive to me.
Comment
12:41 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I want the South Street fire station open and staffed year round, as well as the other two stations. With that said. if having this station open was OPTIONAL, meaning, having it closed was a risk the town manager/fire chief considered an option, then IT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT. This is the newest station in the town and being closed even for a day is unacceptable. Why is it that station, the newest one, gets closed? Close the center station instead!
Co-locate the center station with the police station. Sell the land from the center fire station. Or get rid of the center station and just have the North Street and South Street stations as those buildings, from what I've read, don't need rehab like the center station. Park a fire truck at the police station.
I am sick of paying for buildings like this and see them sit empty. Does anyone even use the second story in the senior center?? But the South Street fire station sits collecting dust. I can't imagine anyone agreeing to allow an override for any other capital improvements in this town when this abuse of taxpayer trust is glaring at us on South Street. Again, if it wasn't a necessity, it should have never been sold to the taxpayers to fund in the first place. Now that you got us to build it STAFF IT.
Marilyn
7:15 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
The senior center does not have a second story.
Amy
12:59 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Ok Im confused, maybe I missed something so someone please help me understand. The town manager is saying they dont have the money in the budget to keep the fire station open correct? Is he trying to insinuate that this building costs such an extreme amount of money to heat and light up with electricity? Are they eliminating part of the fire dept force when they close the South Street fire station or are these fire fighters just being moved to another location in town? Im sorry but something doesnt add up here. If we are not reducing the force during these months the SS fire station is closed, how are we saving that much money where it will actually made a difference? Im sorry but it doesnt cost $350k to heat or provide electricity to that building and if it does, sue the builder because clearly there is a problem with the wiring and insulation.
Richard Menard
3:47 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Amy, this is about staffing that station, not operating costs. That station needs to have at least three members on duty at all times. The reason that building gets "browned" out is because the railroad splits North Tewksbury from the rest of town and the North can't be accessed at times.
Amy
8:53 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Richard as I asked in my post, have these fire fighters been laid off or have they just been moved to another fire house? If they have just been moved to another station in town then how is the town saving money if the fireman are still working just at another location?
TEE
9:50 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
The town is saving money by not funding the Fire Dept fully,
Richard Menard
10:51 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Amy, it is my understanding that tfd is staffing bare minimum at this time. 9 members on three engines and 2 members in the ambulance along with a commander in the s.u.v. A total of 12 per shift. If a member is sick, injured, on military leave, or on a vacation it creates a void that needs to be filled in order to operate at safe levels. I am unaware if it is less expensive to increase staffing or to fill with overtime, the open letter and union state it is more cost effective to use overtimes.
Jake P
1:36 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Mike Callahan, original poster of the open letter, please respond!! How exactly is Tewksbury different from Wilmington. I believe you grew up in Wilmington, please tell us how they get by and at what cost? Don't just stoke the fires and run! What would happen if the fire dept chose to staff in 8 hour shifts, like everybody else on earth? Wouldn't that help this situation? And all the extra overtime $ spent on one for one staffinf. If we had those $ back, its probably enough to keep South St open.If one firefighter calls in sick in this town, another is called at time and a half to replace him. Baloney!!!
TEE
2:47 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Wilmington TM recommended FY14 Fire Budget $3,473103 included in that amount is $500,000 OT for 32 FFs and 6 LTs, 1 Station (shared with PD) Tewksbury TM recommended FY14 Fire Budget $4,290,479 included in that amount is $300,000 OT for 32 FFs, 12 LTs, 4 Capts, 3 stations. Difference of $817,376 for 7,488 more residents and 3.9 more square miles.
john smith
3:06 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Jake I certainly don't have many answers but I don't see how they could work in 8 hour shifts and cover 24 hours a day 365 days a year. They would need twice as many firefighters. A fire truck has to have a certain number of men on it and the same is said for an ambulance. How would you handle that when someone is on vacation, sick or inured? Just explain your theory about 8 hour shifts and how that would work, and also how you would maintain the manpower without the money for OT? I'm willing to bet all fire depts replace the guy who is out for the day and unfortunatly that costs money and it is a necessary expense.
Richard Menard
3:50 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Jake, I see your point and if elected this April 6th, I would advocate for a fiscally responsible plan to prevent closing that station. If it means hiring more men like we do at my job then so be it. That way you can be open for business even if one personis out sick. Maybe it's a combination of both ot and new hires. Not sure what model the chief has presented to the town.
jburke
9:12 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Also, Wilmington has historically been a better run town. Tewksbury has been run by incompetent fools and the current manager is no exception.
Vince
1:35 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
John Smith;
The Malden Revere co-station is not two buildings it is one.
If, as you say it won`t solve anything why did Malden and Revere do it?.
Wilmington certainly does need the So. Tewksbury station for mutual aid.
What`s wrong with both Towns sharing the utility bill?
john smith
2:58 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
It is a single structure yes, but much like a condo it is divided in half for both cities and it is directly on the city line so it is different in that regard. Wilmington will never share the utility bill, it just won't happen. Wilmington does not need the south station for mutual aid, they need Tewksbury Firefighters for mutual aid if the department is underfunded the firefighters are not there.
m hartley
1:35 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
To the selectmen and Town Manager.....I want my South St. Fire Station Open!!!
Stacie
1:59 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
WILMINGTON has a Population of 21,363+ and is 17.2 sq miles
TEWKSBURY has a Population of 28,851 + and is 21.1 sq miles
Wilmington and Tewksbury can't be compared
Simon Cowell
2:33 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I believe the firefighter union is the only union in town that has not settled their contract. Why is this?
Dave
3:49 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Simon, this does not appear to be a contract related article. You may need to start another blog discussion if the contract is your concern. This appears to be an article written and signed by the "Members of the Tewksbury Fire Department, Local 1647". The article seems to be addressing the staffing of all Fire Stations for the safety of ALL of the resident tax payers both in a fire emegency and a medical emergency.
Richard Menard
3:36 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I am a south Tewksbury resident who happens to be a firefighter in another city. Before that, I was a teacher so I am a fairly educated individual. I hope I can possibly shed some light as an outsider looking in.
There is an organization called the NFPA who sets standards from everything to response times to materials FF gear should be constructed of. The crux of this matter is adequate staffing to protect property against fire. Each engine company at minimum should have an officer to command and two firefighters. This crew in a fire is essential,one FF operates the pump while the officer and other FF begin interior operations. These operations begin with life safety, search and rescue. The second crew secures water supply then joins search and rescue and suppression. The third and additional companies begin ventilation of building to allow heat to escape and prevent a flashover. (ever see backdraft? Just like that when room hits ignition point). These companies will also provide protection of exposures, ie your neighbors house. In south Tewksbury, we are all pretty tightly packed in....that stations response means the difference between my neighbors house burning, or theirs, mine, and maybe more.
http://www.nfpa.org/publicColumn.asp?categoryID=2058&itemID=47745&src=NFPAJournal&cookie%5Ftest=1
This is not about unions, contracts, or overtime. This is about staffing our station and protecting our lives!
Jen
6:32 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
So if im reading this right- at least 3 firefighters have to be working in order to have south station open on any random day because 3 are required to staff an engine. If all but 2 ff schedule days off where do those 2 working fire fighters go? If they just go to one of the other stations, is it possible to post just a 2 man ambulance at south station until things get resolved with finances? This would at least help with medical calls. Also, is it possible to only approve time off if it does not make south station go under 3 firefighters? Maybe that could reduce overtime & keep the fire station open.
Richard Menard
11:00 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Jen, you are correct, 3 is the minimum for a company. If there is a station closure, those members are assigned positions on other apparatus. I agree that staffing another ambulance is better than nothing but I live in South Tewksbury and deserve an engine as much as anyone else. Send me E1 to the South station and let them have two ambulances up there. engines in Tewksbury carry emts so they can give me CPR while we wait for the ambulance.....ambulances dont carry water or hoses which is what I expect from my fire department. There is no easy solution to this matter. We need to have a town administration willing to make tough decisions and not level fund the budgets from two years ago. Somebody has to be the "bad guy" and prioritize our expenditures. At home we have to do the same things, why doesn't our town?
JF
5:13 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
I have been a South Tewksbury resident all my life. My house burned this past summer and IF the South St. Fire station was closed I would not have been able to save what the fire Fighters were able to save because by the time a truck from the Ctr got there all would have been lost. It's just crazy, having spent the money on a new fire station and wanting to close it...again. Not to be redundant, but with out the South St. fire station I would have lost my complete structure. I just hope those that want to close the station never, ever have ANY type of an emergency and assistance is delayed because the closest fire station is no longer open. Please rethink the closing, even if it is closed for a few months. Don't do it. Our Firefighters, many lives and homes depend on it staying open.
Richard Menard
10:27 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013
Jf, I've been on both sides and completely agree with you. We had a fire when I was an infant and lost everything. It is a pain that you never want anyone to endure. Thank you for speaking out in support of these guys and how important they are!
Who Me?
6:47 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Could we staff 5 stations?
Who Me?
10:02 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
All of the stations are indeed fully staffed.
This is concerning vacation coverage and overtime.
Which by the way is why it comes to light during the summer months.
Who Me?
10:22 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Tewksbury, 160-170 Million in current and owed debt. Real Estate Taxes up by something like 43%. Second highest water sewer rates in Massachusetts.
And our good Governor wants to put in place the largest tax and fee hike in Massachusetts history.
And yet....we have no money....anyone ever wonder why?
Anyone care?
http://www.boston.com/businessupdates/2013/02/13/block-boston-makes-list-the-most-taxed-cities-america/x9q3XVBRI6bTZEUWwl1L5I/story.html
Cecil Moore
12:33 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Harry,
You do raise some good points and always add links which support your assertions. However, the "WE" stuff throws me off. You moved from Tewksbury to New Hampshire. I am not sure that "we" still share the same debt or that "we" face the tax increases proposed by Gov. Patrick. Are you facing the same issues in your current New Hamsphire town?
Mary Ellen Fernald
1:42 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
No fire stations should be closed. The south is a very congested part of the town.
The north is separated by the railroad tracks. Time is of the essence during a fire or emergency. I have asked this question many times, what amount of money does it take to maintain this building?. We still have to pay personnel. So what are we saving, and is it worth it? We are dealing with human life. Why is it that when a town needs cutbacks, it is the emergency services like fire, police and edcuation are the first to be sacrificed? Why are other departments not required to cut back? Shouldn't department heads curtail raises for a couple of years?.
If elected, I have no intention of taking a salary.
TEE
2:47 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
The letter isn't about maintaining the building it is about maitaining proper staffing for the building. TheTM presented an underfunded Fire Dept budget to the BOS for FY14, which will result in the closing of the South Station, and the residents of South Tewksbury losing prescious minutes in event of an emergency
Richard Menard
12:09 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Mary Ellen,
I a glad to see that I am not the only candidate willing to come forward and take a stand on this topic. If you read the threads you will see that this is about budgeting staffing and not about maintaining the overhead of the building. While the offer to refrain from collecting the $4,500 stipend if elect is a nice sentiment, we need to look at something more substantial to close the $320,000 gap the town manager has proposed. Trying to extend our bond from 20 to 30 years for the sewer project that is now incorporated inn the tax base would decrese the payment and open up more funds to fill our towns needs. Increasing our commercial tax base, and I mean more than just getting Corning to add 4 employees and a warehouse, by improving infrastructure and increasing traffic flow is a good start.
Richard Menard
12:12 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Please excuse the typos, the iPad presents a small window that won't let me scroll up to proof read....steve jobs, may he rest in peace left some undone work in this technology!
Who Me?
2:32 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Is the Tewksbury Fire Department fully staffed or not?
http://tewksbury.patch.com/articles/selectmen-s-notebook-new-firefighters-hired-introduced
TEE
2:49 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Yes the Dept is fully staffed 4 shifts of 12, no extra.
Who Me?
2:53 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Thank you, so is the specific issue;
A. The Town doesn't have any overtime monies to cover vacations?
or
B. The Town doesn't have enough Firefighters interested in Overtime so the station falls below minimum manning?
Dave
3:19 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Lay them off, I get tired of the bullying mentallity of UNIONS first it's the teachers. Well I have a message for you get a job in the private sector or work two jobs like everyone else has to....No Sympathy here quit whining instead of picking pockets of the over taxed and please no response from their bleeding heart family members...they can get another job too, so get off the soapbox blame the incompentency of the town!
john smith
3:46 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Dave your message is useless. It offers nothing of substance. Your solution to keeping all the fire houses open is to layoff? That doesn't even make sense. You are all over the place except for the topic of discussion. There was nothing in this letter that had a bullying tone as far as I could tell. The firefighters are not asking for money or an override, just a normal funded budget from money the town already has, to keep the stations open. The issue is the town not using the money for that purpose and closing a firehouse for 6 years.
Dave
6:41 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
John boy,
Obviously they don't have the money to fund it or you (Jake) because the Town can't afford the unfunded liability is why the town had to close the south fire station..
Johnny what is the unfunded liability? well Johnny it comes in form of a pension and when a Jake is of retirement age he or she wants to be promoted 3yrs before retire...is why this Town can't balance the budget...John boy have someone read the letter out to you...stop hiding behind the Union!
john smith
6:50 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
Dave Boy,
They do have the money to fund it. That is the issue. Again you are all over the place talking about promotions? I don't think that plays any part in this discussion at all. Davey we all know what unfunded liability is so no need for your lecture. Davey boy I have read the letter and unlike you I understand it.
Dave
10:46 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
What happens next year Johnny Jake where will get funds..your all over the the place with useless derogatory comments...That's right Jakes don't look that far ahead that's another fight next year..give it a break pal go back to your union buddies as I surely struck nerve in to the heart of HACKVILLE ...that's why you try to make light of everyone else's comment..your probably using a Townowned laptop..save it sparky
Dave
10:46 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
What happens next year Johnny Jake where will get funds..your all over the the place with useless derogatory comments...That's right Jakes don't look that far ahead that's another fight next year..give it a break pal go back to your union buddies as I surely struck nerve in to the heart of HACKVILLE ...that's why you try to make light of everyone else's comment..your probably using a Townowned laptop..save it sparky
Richard Menard
12:03 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Dave I appreciate you enthusiasm on the matter but this closure isn't effecting the firefighters, it's effecting my family and I. This isn't the tfd asking for a raise or the publics support for contract concessions...this is about them making the public who weren't able to attend the selectman's budget meeting aware of the changes coming down the road. I was one of a select few able to make the Tuesday night meeting where this topic was broached and was appalled by the lack of debate, ire, or even discussion of alternatives that ensued. Being pro or anti union doesn't matter in this case...being pro life safety or pro gambling on the odds is the crux. Rest assured this matter effects the whole town. 2 fire engines can't handle a serious fire with today's modern construction practices and materials. With other cities and towns stretching their resources thin already, there is no guarantee they will be there to aide us either.
john smith
6:03 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Davey Boy I am done with this useless back and forth with you. Every post you write makes you sound even crazier. You are obviously antiunion and would take any and all opportunities to turn the discussion against the worker. This is about public safety whether you believe it, understand it, or not. Good luck to you!
Dave
3:26 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
What the town officials don't lack is ineptitude!
Melissa Gleaton
10:26 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013
As a resident who is served by the South St. station, I find it APPALLING to have it closed for whatever reason they give. If we have stabilization funds, we need to stabilize. However, this doesn't resolve future year's budget shortfalls. We can't keep going into reserve funds to bandaid the issue. Tough times call for tough measures. What "luxuries" are we funding that need to be cut? Sure, it will NOT make department heads happy to have their budgets slashed, but Mr. Montori's job isn't to make the department heads happy - it's to make US happy (and safe)!
Richard Menard
11:23 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Melissa, you are dead on! This is the main reason I was motivated to run, I fear that the town manager has lost sight of what the people want and the board of selectman aren't reaching him and enforcing the will of the people. To go through what we went through at town meeting only to accept a proposed budget that goes against what people want is reprehensible. Please see my website, www.richardmenard.org to see where I stand on these and other issues. Also check out the press release from the professional fire fighters of Massachusetts while you're there.
Who Me?
12:42 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Mr. Menard
With all due respect, I'm concerned that you sound more like a Firefighter here versus a Candidate for office. I respect that you are a Firefighter but I'm concerned that you don't sound like someone who has an open mind on the current subject.
"You fear that the Town manager"
"Reprehensible"
Action words and certainly used in all cases where one has already made up their minds........
Have you already made up your mind Mr. Menard?
Have you already been in a position to see the Town's Financial Documents to allow you to sound so certain that the monies are there for the Overtime?
If so, how the heck were you allowed to see it?
And if not, should you not wait until elected, and have had a chance to review all expenditures before coming down on one side or the other?
Unless, of course you are already biased.....perhaps?
Should you even be making such statements at this point?
People who have biased agendas are politicians.
People who have an open mind and are willing to consider what’s best for all...are Leaders..
Bid difference between the two.
Will you be able to separate yourself as a Firefighter to be able to represent all the citizens of Tewksbury?
Your posts have me wondering....
Richard Menard
12:59 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Who Me,
Thank you for your feedback, as a first time candidate I appreciate any criticisms from the town as it will make me be a better leader. Knowing that I hear your voices and take them into account while serving should help in making your choices in April.
I know that I have used strong words in this regard because it is a cause that I feel passionate about. I have the unique perspective of being in a burning building searching for victims. I chose what I feel is one of the noblest professions and sacrifice family time, holidays, and lack of salary (my education should garner me more than my $50,000 a year for a family of 5) because I feel that I am doing work that truly makes a difference.
Living in South Tewksbury without Fire protection is reckless and our town leaders may not realize it, but they are gambling with lives. I am not trying to scare anybody, just educate because of my knowledge in the field. If a health expert told me I needed to dig up radon in my house because it causes cancer and my family is at risk, I would listen. I would prioritize my spending to keep my family safe. I am asking that the town do the same.
I have already made up my mind, public safety is a priority that I am willing to stand on. I am also willing to stand up for the police if staffing were being threatened and for teachers is classrooms became over crowded, neither are the case at the moment. (continued)
Who Me?
1:45 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Thanks for your feed-back Mr. Menard.
Not sure your response address any of my questions but simply becomes a metaphor for mu original post. At least you responded and I'll give you that.
Do you have any inkling that the Town's financial debt is quite significant?
Are you concerned that Tewksbury has the second highest water/sewer rates in the State of Massachusetts?
Are you concerned that Tewksbury is listed here?
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/2013/01/27/top-property-tax-increases-eastern-massachusetts/gE3H4ycxPMt9f1X0DnSoEI/story.html
Do you believe the above costs are keeping Tewksbury from obtaining and holding onto tax paying businesses?
Do you believe that the Taxpayers of Tewksbury are "taxed' out?
The problems that face Tewksbury are significant and serious. I salute you for your service and beliefs. However, a one issue candidate may short change the needs of the whole Town.
If we don't get a handle on spending then the issue of keeping the South Tewksbury Fire Station open in the summer will morph into the Town's inability to keep any Fire Station open at all.
Hoping you, and all the other Candidates, realize that.
Richard Menard
1:46 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
As for being in a position to see private documents, I have not been in such a place. I have seen the Public proposed FY14 budget that is at the library, senior center, and town hall, also by the link to the patch article here: http://tewksbury.patch.com/articles/montuori-unveils-88-2-million-budget-for-fy2014
I am not a town employee, other than a part time substitute teacher, so the only access I have is as a tax paying resident.
I do have a biased opinion because this matter directly effects my family. If I'm not willing to stand up for causes I believe in, causes that could mean my children's lives, then what type of leader would I be? What type of man wouldn't stand up, put his name on the line and hold true to his convictions?
I will not sit by idly while decisions are being made that put me, as a South Tewksbury Resident in jeopardy.
There are times to compromise and times to hold fast, this issue is the latter of the two.
I truly hope that nobody ever need call 911, but I am not willing to risk there being a delay in help if they ever do. Please follow the previous links I have posted to see the empirical data from the NFPA. As I have stated, I'm a Tewksbury resident who happens to be a firefighter, I was a teacher before that so I am also passionate about educational issues as well. Wanna talk MCAS scores? Level 3 threshold makes me uneasy as does the amount of $ we send to the Tech. Student retention is another focus I have if elected. see my site for more.
Richard Menard
2:04 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Sorry about the break between posts. I just looked at the Globe page and trust me, I am very aware of the tax increases. As I said, very meager income in the Menard house and even worse during those times of increasing taxes when my wife was laid off and we nearly lost the house we are upside down in. I am not advocating to raise taxes, I think we are burdened enough. In fact I am proposing ways through debt extention and student retention that will help keep costs down. If elected I want to investigate many issues surrounding our town budget, such as the item listed as software on page 7 for $164,000. That is one of the items I would be willing to compromise if the use of it saves the Town money in the long run, but not at the cost of essential services.
Cecil Moore
8:29 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Richard,
Thank you for stepping up as a candidate. It is important that the voters have a diversity in ballot choices. I look forward to hearing more from you and the positions you take. I would offer a word of caution in addressing those with hidden id's and agendas. For example, "who me" is attempting to drag you into debate over public service, and is a poster who called himself "Harry" on the website Tewksbury Issues. He is an antagonist, malcontent, and general overall nuisance. He will not be voting for you, as he has moved to New Hampshire. If I were campaigning for office in Tewksbury, I would try and attend every civic group meeting, senior center events, and challenge your opponents to public or radio debates. Coming on here, though your intentions are noble, is an effort in futility. All the best to you. I look forward to finding a candidate deserving of my vote. God bless.
Cecil
denise
8:42 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Cecil Moore...good advice.
jo
4:22 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Welcome to the world of politics Candidate Menard. I admire you for taking a strong position on an issue that is obviously important to you. As for your being a firefighter I would think that your opinion on safety is well informed. I agree with your position on the South Tewksbury fire station being essential. My original post on this subject was aimed at having individuals identify priorities or perhaps alternative ways to keep the fire station open year round. I do not have the answers, but feel that responsible individuals can work to arrive at some solution or compromise. I do respect you for stating your position clearly and not waffling on the issue when challenged. Perhaps the other candidates may want to share their opinions, since you publicly addressed the matter. Good Luck in your campaign.
denise
5:52 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I appriciate that Richard Menard is not backing away from answering questions on here...a difficult forum to say the least. But i have had the pleasure of knowing him, and he is concerned deeply about the whole future of tewksbury. He has knowledge of the schools, his kids are attending them and he is also a substitute teacher. He is a hard worker, willing to make sacrifisies, to better the town. I for one would trust someone who works hard trying to support a family with the towns future, than someone who grew up in a priviledged house...He can count on me for a vote. He is willing to stand up and talk to anyone about the issues. Sorry bout my spelling, just venting...thank you.
Mary Kelley
7:27 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
As a resident of south tewksbury for over twenty years I feel it is imperative that this station remains open
Patrick Shannon
8:10 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
My wife and I have a lot of family and friends in south Tewksbury, KEEP the south station open...
Simon Cowell
8:55 am on Monday, February 18, 2013
I feel like there is more than meets the eye here with this issue. Fear mongering is never a good place to start, and I feel like this issue could be more openly and transparently worked through. I think it is a stretch for anyone to imply Town Manager Montouri is being negligent with this issue as he has been very productive and competent since he got here. Perhaps he sees something with how the department is being managed that we arent aware of. I still dont have an answer as to why the Firefighters contract is not settled yet when every other union signed last year. There has to be more to this but I am sure the answer to keeping the fire station open is not just handing over whatever money is asked for.
john smith
10:05 am on Monday, February 18, 2013
It is not fear mongering if it is true. Has the station closed off and on for 6 years? Is it due to close again this year? Is it unsafe to have the station closed? Is there money available to prevent the closure? The answer is yes to all of the above questions. How is that fear mongering?
john smith
10:13 am on Monday, February 18, 2013
Actually Simon if transparency is important to you then this letter has done just that. Had this firefighter not written this letter and posted it, the residents would not know the station is going to close again this year. The firefighters are making the residents aware of the situation before the closed signs are out and maybe active residents can prevent it.
Bob Kelley
10:34 am on Monday, February 18, 2013
Like many of the posters on this blog, I am very concerned that the Town officials, especially the three Selectmen who live in the vicinity, would continue to kick this can down the proverbially road again.
The people of South Tewksbury deserve better safety measures than waiting for a timely response from the center fire station in an emergency.
We all know the traffic issues of traveling down Route 38 on a busy day and more importantly during bad weather like the recent blizzard.
Like one poster said God forbid that our first responders don't respond quickly because of a staffing issue. Try to explain that to anyone who's safety is at stake here.
I agree with another poster that if the budget is really the issue then we need to find other budget savings to keep the station open at least for ambulance service.
Also, why can't we contract with a private ambulance service to cover this area of Town during the closure?
There are solutions to this problem but we need taxpayers to voice and vote their concerns to the Selectmen and Town boards and fix the problem permanently.
I'm pleased that candidate Menard is making this a priority if elected to the BOS in April.
Richard Menard
7:55 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Thanks to all of you voicing your support of my candidacy, but most importantly, your support of keeping the South Station open. Please know that I appreciate anyones feedback, be it positive or negative. I paraphrase Thomas Jefferson who said, Though I disagree wholeheartedly with your opinion, I will fight til my dying breath for your right to voice it. This is just one topic that I feel passionate about which is why the Professional Firefighters of our Commonwealth have endorsed me in this election. This is not about opening the Town Coffers and paying the guys a kings ransom, this is about working within the parameters of their contract to keep our staffing at levels safe enough to protect the Taxpayers. I will be away from my computer alot this week with kids and work but will check emails from my device. If you want to show support or get details on my views, check out my site at www.RichardMenard.org. You can also drop me a comment from there or email MenardforTewksbury@gmail.com. Let your voice be heard on April 6th.
Thanks,
-Rick