patching...
Breaking: Lt. Gov. Tim Murray to Resign »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Rep. Miceli Votes To Unionize Your Child Care

As if affordable day care for working families isn’t expensive enough, Rep. Jim Miceli voted “yes” on Gov. Deval Patrick’s bill (H 3986) that allows your child care workers to form unions.

To qualify, a provider working out of their home must receive at least one state voucher for providing services, currently priced at $28/day. The theory: “together they can” lobby state child-care bureaucrats for more of your tax money by using union muscle. Even the business owner must join the union.

The vote’s anti-business result? Providers can stop taking vouchers, raise their rates, or go out of business. None of these options helps working families. Rep. Miceli: why make it harder for working mothers in Wilmington and Tewksbury to find day care slots?

Go figure.

Michelle

7:20 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

The SEIU Family Childcare Union Bill. This bill forces Family Childcare Providers who accept state vouchers to join the union, or if they don’t join the union, pay up to 90% of the union fees anyways. It gives the Union the right to negotiate rates with EEC, making Family Childcare Providers employees of the State. This bill will not give the providers any of the benefits of being a state worker (insurance, etc). In many cases this forces those providers to work for less than minimum wage.
I believe this bill will lower the quality of childcare for low income families and limit their choices for childcare even more than it currently is. I believe it will drive down the market rates across the state, and force many experienced providers out of the business. The ultimate effects of this bill will be to limit the quality of childcare for all children.
MA has the most stringent standard of care of any state in this country. Keeping the quality of care up is important to the future of our state. This bill will make this impossible.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lawrence Lavargna

12:13 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

The unions of today are exactly what the unions of yesterday were fighting against. Those pinky ring thugs are nothing more than lobbyists for the Democrats, That's where the pricey dues go. Try to get help from them. **crickets chirping**

malcolm nichols

7:52 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Time for the little "bowling ball" to roll over into the gutter. He just doesn't get it. Less is more, get out of the way and stop dragging out the recession.

Reply

Don Ordway

5:50 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

This certainly appears to be outragous. It is hard enough for both parents to work today and show a profit after paying taxes, travel expenses, lunches etc. One person in the household may as well stay home because of the high cost of day care; which may be the goal that we are facing. I don't believe they will be able collect unemployment, but it will open new jobs for those in the search of jobs and with mom or dad staying home it will lower unemployment. The people searching for jobs may find one at the expense of the person that was forced economically to leave one. What happened to the America we all loved and respected? Where we helped each other? Today everything is a game placing the unions ahead of the voters and families. Is it another union bailout? I hope there is an explanation for all of this, I can't believe it's happening in America.

Reply

Steve H

8:15 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

nice job Jim, once again looking out for the working class, really is time for a change, he is out of touch

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul

8:42 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Jim is only out of touch with WILMINGTON, he could care less about Wilmington!!!! go to his office and try to get help from him, you ONLY get one of his workers and then they say he will do his best to help you. F You Jim !!!!!!good luck running again when Tewksbury votes you in, because Wilmington has figured you out if they have not yet.

Comment_arrow

RunningGreen

5:06 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

The camera work was nice and it looked like a beautiful sunset, but what does a protest in Oakland have anything to do with your campaign?

Comment_arrow

Al Roberts

7:48 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Why dont you propose a way to help Wilmington deal with these spiteful appeals of our new High School? Its obvious Miceli is worthless, are you asking us to vote a worthless change?

RunningGreen

8:14 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Here's my personal opinion: I would much rather hear about what you would do at the State House than what Miceli has done. I can decide for myself as to what role Miceli has played. If you want to convince voters you are the right candidate, why not focus entirely on laying out your goals and positions? We, as the electorate, can decide for ourselves if our elected leaders are doing a good job. I am constantly annoyed at how candidates at all levels on politics focus so much time on attacking each other rather than actually saying what they want to do. It does nothing in terms of winning my vote. I would much rather vote for someone who lets me decide which candidate is better by explaining his beliefs and strengths rather than attacking his opponent.

And I'm not saying Miceli is any better than you in terms of doing this. It tends to be a problem at all levels.

Reply

Jeff Twohig

9:49 pm on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Outrageous and stupid Democrat legislation with the intent of sucking more money out of taxpayer wallets. Liberalism is, truly, a mental illness.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RunningGreen

6:14 am on Friday, August 3, 2012

And that is what is wrong with our country. Instead of respectably making your point, you resort to name-calling and ridicule. By the way, never use a mental condition as a derogatory term. That is completely unacceptable and shameful.

Douglas W. Sears

7:25 am on Friday, August 3, 2012

Running Green, Al Roberts and others:

It's time!

Yes, it is time for me to work interested citizens of Wilmington on the High School situation. Yes, I support its being built as soon as possible + a turf field in place.

But, agreement needs to implement appellants' concerns, where reasonable. Let me hear your suggestions first-hand how -- as an objective outsider -- I might help bring a positive outcome where insiders are too entrenched in their positions to help? Call me.

As your Representative, I'll fight for you as zealously as Jim Miceli did before he became part of “business as usual on Beacon Hill.”

There's no magic to positive change. I can not do it alone. But with the help of the people and the Representatives -- and the zeal of those on Beacon Hill committed to Retiring One Party Rule -- Wilmington can begin to:

1. REIGN IN outrageous state spending;
2. REDUCE income & sales tax rates;
3. RESTORE LOCAL aid to support education & public safety -- every year, not only in an election year!
4. REMOVE over-regulation of job-creating small businesses.

We can help each other -- in an increasingly TWO PARTY State House -- to RETURN MASSACHUSETTS TO WORK.

Please call me directly on my cellphone -- (978) 376 7390 with your questions, suggestions or concerns.

You can also visit my website: Doug4Rep.com

Or email me at: doug4rep@gmail.com

Thank you for your consideration, your support and your vote!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al Roberts

8:22 am on Friday, August 3, 2012

Are you serious? You show a breathtaking lack of knowledge of both the facts of the situation and the players to make such a ridiculous statement that calls for negotiation with the appelllants and and an incorporation of their "reasonable" concerns. Number One: These people are like terrorists. You cannot negotiate with them and they have malintent. Number Two: their concerns are specious, mostly unintelligible, wholly irrelevant and havebeen previously vetted, considered, debated and dismissed. Time to go back to school Doug. You need to know what you are dealing with to prevent sounding foolish. I suspect you may be a more attractive option than Miceli (who is actually friends with these people that are harming us) but Im not too excited.

Joe L

1:19 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012

As someone who has children in daycare I think they are already overregulated. Some can be good an necessary as I think some are. But some of these regulations are ridiculous. I can't see how unionizing the workers would help any. And forcing any working adult to join a union is un-American. It should be thier choice and they should not be penalized or, the million dollar word these days, bullied into joining.

Reply

Douglas W. Sears

7:48 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Kevin needs unionized child-care?

The WPD is unionized, but in a good way!

Reply

Leave a comment