.

Governor's Proposal Expected to All But Abolish Chelmsford Housing Authority. What Do You Think?

Doing away with local housing boards is reported to be Gov. Patrick's idea for slashing public housing cost and corruption. Do you think that's a good idea?

The Chelmsford Housing Authority, one of 240 public housing authorities across Massachusetts, would all but vanish as part of what is expected to be a proposal from Gov. Deval Patrick to streamline public housing management operations.

The purpose of local housing authorities is to manage and maintain subsidized housing and, often, to advocate for affordable housing for lower-income residents.

The administration reportedly estimates the consolidation would save more than $10 million a year in salaries and administrative costs.

According to the Boston Globe, while Gov. Patrick's proposal would centralize public housing management into six regional ­offices, a small number of managers and maintenance workers would remain at local housing author­ities.

And, says the Globe, cutting local boards would would do away with the need for more than 1,000 politically appointed commissioners.

The consolidation move comes in the wake of troubling corruption scandals uncovered by the Globe, which were partly possible because holding hundreds of separate housing authorities accountable is a management challenge.

In the legislature, Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester) appreciated Patrick's decision to address the issue, but was concerned consolidation may not be the answer.

"We cannot be certain how effective the Governor’s proposal will be until we have all the details, but productive reform needs to be about more than a power shift to Boston of responsibilities currently handled locally," said Tarr.  "I look forward to working with all of the interested parties to produce needed and meaningful reforms.”

Vivian Merrill January 11, 2013 at 04:05 PM
I think this could be a 40B nightmare. At least with Chelmsford's Housing authority you get proposals that are 100% "affordable-a private developer only gives you 25% "affordable". 25% doesn't do anything for getting a town to it's 10% "affordable" goal. I suppose there would be not much stopping the existing housing authorities from forming new and different organizations and doing the same thing without state supervision. The downside would that it would be very difficult for them to offer the 100% affordable proposals, unless there were some funding incentives.
Tom Gilroy January 11, 2013 at 05:31 PM
Any time you relinquish Home Rule to the state you get more hacks, no local control and guaranteed corruption. This is a bad idea.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »